User forums > Help
Crashes
Pecan:
--- Quote from: digi_relm on February 11, 2007, 03:27:15 pm ---Hi
Sorry could you post a link I am having trouble finding the RPM
digi_relm
--- End quote ---
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Compiled_packages_of_Code::Blocks
Compiled packages of Code::Blocks - CodeBlocks
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Compiling_Code::Blocks_in_RPM_based_distributions
Google:
site:forums.codeblocks.org suse 10.2
TheTuxKeeper:
The 03 february 2007 build is out.
The suse100+101 packages seem to work under suse 10.2. I didn't really check this myself (just ran it once under 10.2, but without any problem).
btw. do you really use wxGTK 2.6.1 ? suse 10.2 uses 2.6.3. Did you update suse ?
Biplab:
--- Quote from: daniel2000 on February 11, 2007, 06:30:28 pm ---The suse100+101 packages seem to work under suse 10.2. I didn't really check this myself (just ran it once under 10.2, but without any problem).
btw. do you really use wxGTK 2.6.1 ? suse 10.2 uses 2.6.3. Did you update suse ?
--- End quote ---
They (10+10.1 rpm) work perfectly under OpenSUSE 10.2. I have tested it.
Though I use wxGTK 2.6.3 and GCC 4.1.2 to compile it from svn source. I don't know how create a RPM from the compiled binary. If you can provide some informations on how to do that I can upload it periodically. :)
TheTuxKeeper:
I think one package is enough. They run under 10.2 so why more, it's just causing more confusion ;)
I'll try to upload at least weekly, suse and fedora packages. todays nightly is already in queue (but have to wait till the computer is idle :P ) so at latest tomorrow morning a new suse nightly will be available (even if the "not yet" is still there) :)
The second link pecan posted should be enough to build a rpm succesfully. The points 1.2 and 2 are what should be enough for you :)
I don't use the spec file in the svn repo to create the nightlies (nightlies = one package <=> svn spec file = multiple packages)
To create a rpm out of already built files is possible but much more complicated than recompiling ;)
Biplab:
--- Quote from: daniel2000 on February 11, 2007, 07:22:56 pm ---I think one package is enough. They run under 10.2 so why more, it's just causing more confusion ;)
--- End quote ---
You are right. That may create confusion. But when they work on 10.2, then please add 10.2 somewhere in the file name so that user can come to know about that. :D
--- Quote from: daniel2000 on February 11, 2007, 07:22:56 pm ---I'll try to upload at least weekly, suse and fedora packages. todays nightly is already in queue (but have to wait till the computer is idle :P ) so at latest tomorrow morning a new suse nightly will be available (even if the "not yet" is still there) :)
--- End quote ---
Thanks for the post. :)
--- Quote from: daniel2000 on February 11, 2007, 07:22:56 pm ---The second link pecan posted should be enough to build a rpm succesfully. The points 1.2 and 2 are what should be enough for you :)
I don't use the spec file in the svn repo to create the nightlies (nightlies = one package <=> svn spec file = multiple packages)
To create a rpm out of already built files is possible but much more complicated than recompiling ;)
--- End quote ---
It seems the process is bit complex. I'll continue using make install till I figure out how to create a RPM. Don't worry, I'll not start any parallel distribution once I create first RPM. Unless it's stable in my PC and you devs agree, it won't be out. :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version