User forums > Help

Crashes

<< < (3/3)

TheTuxKeeper:

--- Quote from: Biplab on February 11, 2007, 07:48:54 pm ---You are right. That may create confusion. But when they work on 10.2, then please add 10.2 somewhere in the file name so that user can come to know about that.  :D
--- End quote ---
You're right. But I've installed the suse100+101 package under 10.2 for the first time just 2 weeks ago and only started codeblocks twice.
I'll rename it to  suse100-102.  :)


--- Quote from: Biplab on February 11, 2007, 07:48:54 pm ---
--- Quote from: daniel2000 on February 11, 2007, 07:22:56 pm ---The second link pecan posted should be enough to build a rpm succesfully. The points 1.2 and 2 are what should be enough for you  :)
I don't use the spec file in the svn repo to create the nightlies (nightlies = one package <=> svn spec file = multiple packages)

To create a rpm out of already built files is possible but much more complicated than recompiling ;)
--- End quote ---

It seems the process is bit complex. I'll continue using make install till I figure out how to create a RPM. Don't worry, I'll not start any parallel distribution once I create first RPM. Unless it's stable in my PC and you devs agree, it won't be out.  :)

--- End quote ---
No, it isn't very complicated to create an rpm. Just set up the non-root environment, install the dependencies and run these commands:

--- Code: ---./bootstrap
./configure --enable-contrib
make dist
rpmbuild -tb codeblocks-trunk-r$REVISION.tar.gz
--- End code ---
The rpm packages will be in one of the architecture specific subdirectories (i386, x86_64, ppc, ...) of $RPM_TOPDIR/RPMS/. Install codeblocks-1.0_0.svn.$REVISION-0.suse102.i586.rpm and codeblocks-contrib-1.0_0.svn.$REVISION-0.suse102.i586.rpm as root :D

If you want the one-package spec file i can pm it to you. It's not at the same level as the one in svn, but it does what it should do  :lol:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page