User forums > Nightly builds

The 26 november 2006 build is out.

<< < (2/3) > >>

cstudent:
Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy) build here.

magisu:
i think it does not work as well as told.

#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
    ifstream fs;
   cout<<"Hello!"<<endl;

    fs.

   return 0;
}

when i entered the dot after fs, nothing happened...


another problem is when I used templates like this

vector<int> ss;

the auto-completion box appeared and showed the right item.but the template is wrong.

ss.push_back( )
here the hint showed the parameter is BOOL type.

mandrav:

--- Quote from: magisu ---i think it does not work as well as told.
--- End quote ---

--- Quote from: changelog ---means that a larger part of STL is now parsed
--- End quote ---


--- Quote from: magisu ---another problem is when I used templates like this

vector<int> ss;

the auto-completion box appeared and showed the right item.but the template is wrong.

ss.push_back( )
here the hint showed the parameter is BOOL type.
--- End quote ---

Template parameters are not parsed so I wouldn't expect this to work.

RJP Computing:
I am not sure if this is a feature request or bug report. When you build an application and you have Code::Blocks set to hide the "message pane" it hides it even if there are linking errors. So it seems that your application built correctly when in fact it doesn't. This also probably has something to do with the fact that there are no linker errors/warnings that get passed to the 'Build Messages' tab. This is where the line between bug and feature request gets blurry. The wording in the preference dialog makes it clear that it will work for building only, but the definition of build should include linking as well. (I think  :) )

mandrav:

--- Quote from: RJP Computing on November 27, 2006, 04:40:03 pm ---I am not sure if this is a feature request or bug report. When you build an application and you have Code::Blocks set to hide the "message pane" it hides it even if there are linking errors. So it seems that your application built correctly when in fact it doesn't. This also probably has something to do with the fact that there are no linker errors/warnings that get passed to the 'Build Messages' tab. This is where the line between bug and feature request gets blurry. The wording in the preference dialog makes it clear that it will work for building only, but the definition of build should include linking as well. (I think  :) )

--- End quote ---

Right, "build = compile+link".
And yes, there is a specific kind of linker error which doesn't get recognized and so I 'd call it a bug.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page