Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
Development roadmap?
rickg22:
ACK! Erm, I meant which of the feature requests ALREDY submitted...
(Yiannis is going to kill me :cry: )
Ok here goes again
Which one of the bug reports or feature requests *ALREADY SUBMITTED* do you consider would have to be fixed/added before we release 1.0-Final?
My objective here is to have some kind of development roadmap so that *WE developers* can start working on them and speed up the current C::B development.
No need for fancy explanations, just list them.
David Perfors:
--- Quote from: rickg22 ---ACK! Erm, I meant which of the feature requests ALREDY submitted...
(Yiannis is going to kill me :cry: )
Ok here goes again
Which one of the bug reports or feature requests *ALREADY SUBMITTED* do you consider would have to be fixed/added before we release 1.0-Final?
My objective here is to have some kind of development roadmap so that *WE developers* can start working on them and speed up the current C::B development.
No need for fancy explanations, just list them.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: takeshimiya ---In order of importance to me:
- Change the behaviour of the click at the breakpoint margin
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1201664&group_id=126998&atid=707419
- Customizable shortcuts (key bindings)
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1201652&group_id=126998&atid=707419
- Go to function with CTRL+click ("Go to Definition" and "Go to declaration" in the context menu also.)
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1212127&group_id=126998&atid=707419
--- End quote ---
:lol:
Anonymous:
RC versions should be polished, so IMHO the highest priority should be given to bugs (especially those that can be reproduced everywhere or causes C::B to crash) or simple requests, that make useful tweaks of what already exists.
Btw. is it just me, or some among open bug submissions report that stability of C::B under various Linux systems suffers a bit?
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: Anonymous ---RC versions should be polished, so IMHO the highest priority should be given to bugs (especially those that can be reproduced everywhere or causes C::B to die horrible death ;) ) or simple requests, that make useful tweaks of what already exists.
Btw. is it just me, or some among open bug submissions report that stability of C::B under various Linux systems suffers a bit?
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
Saparate C/C++ switchs or file-specific switchs.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version