User forums > Nightly builds
The 12 october 2006 build is out.
thomas:
--- Quote from: eranif on October 13, 2006, 03:28:01 pm ---Most of the changes are making sense, and I will try to incorporate them inside CVS. I think most of them are OK, except for the "header" one, since I want to keep the current directory structure (it is the common contrib directory structure)
--- End quote ---
I didn't understand that one anyway, having the headers in the "standard contrib" fashion works nicely, if we add one more path to the project, doesn't it?
killerbot:
--- Quote from: eranif on October 13, 2006, 03:28:01 pm ---Most of the changes are making sense, and I will try to incorporate them inside CVS. I think most of them are OK, except for the "header" one, since I want to keep the current directory structure (it is the common contrib directory structure)
I will look at the changes tomorrow (I already insertd the
- wxFNB_ALLOW_FOREIGN_DND
- SetSelection now fires the 'Page Change' instead of OnLeftDown
- All XPM files were moved to fnb_resources.cpp file, fnb_resources.h now externs them all
- Fixed the drawing issue mentioned by Ceniza
OnDropTagret already contains the mentioned fix, ( see above new style: wxFNB_ALLOW_FOREIGN_DND )
With regards,
Eran
--- End quote ---
Then the day after tomorrow, I will sync our sources with your's in cvs (have already done that today, but won't commit yet) ;-) , or whenever you get to it
killerbot:
--- Quote from: thomas on October 13, 2006, 04:06:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: eranif on October 13, 2006, 03:28:01 pm ---Most of the changes are making sense, and I will try to incorporate them inside CVS. I think most of them are OK, except for the "header" one, since I want to keep the current directory structure (it is the common contrib directory structure)
--- End quote ---
I didn't understand that one anyway, having the headers in the "standard contrib" fashion works nicely, if we add one more path to the project, doesn't it?
--- End quote ---
will change that accordingly on the "day after tomorrow" :-)
mandrav:
--- Quote from: thomas on October 13, 2006, 04:06:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: eranif on October 13, 2006, 03:28:01 pm ---Most of the changes are making sense, and I will try to incorporate them inside CVS. I think most of them are OK, except for the "header" one, since I want to keep the current directory structure (it is the common contrib directory structure)
--- End quote ---
I didn't understand that one anyway, having the headers in the "standard contrib" fashion works nicely, if we add one more path to the project, doesn't it?
--- End quote ---
As I commented to killerbot (but seems like he missed it), this is not a problem: we can always re-arrange them like in the original sources.
killerbot:
no I didn't miss it, I just gave a state on what is changed NOW, the future will be different (include difference will be removed, eranif already incorporated some of our changes and maybe the others [no not the others from LOST ;-) ]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version