User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
Scripted wizards
takeshimiya:
--- Quote from: tiwag on October 13, 2006, 08:02:04 pm ---but i would like to discuss how the "official" CB wizzards should be designed.
since it is a question of philosophy, it can't hurt if we get a few opinions, isn't it ?
--- End quote ---
Yep, it's the same I intended to say above:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on October 10, 2006, 02:09:42 pm ---
--- Quote from: mandrav on October 10, 2006, 01:47:04 pm ---Besides, no-one is stopping you to create a wizard with just one page, effectively simulating the dialog you 're suggesting ;).
--- End quote ---
Of course nothing stops no-one, but we have to discuss things first, right? If not, one could do a wizard in one way and another person in other way. And consistency would be lost.
--- End quote ---
This means, we know we can modify everything, since this is opensource, but we're talking about making better defaults for everyone.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: tiwag on October 13, 2006, 08:02:04 pm ---since it is a question of philosophy, it can't hurt if we get a few opinions, isn't it ?
--- End quote ---
I didn't mean to offend here - I really wasn't sure if anybody is aware of the fact that indeed this is not a limitation of the scripted wizard plugin, but only the wizards itself as they are now. I surely didn't mean to suppress a discussion here (of course not) - but this will be endless if we don't come up with a sample implementation. And we had that discussion already...
So really: I only meant to clarify the facts and that's it. I fully respect and support a discussion of how things could be done better.
With regards, Morten.
Edit: And to add another opinion: For me at work (where round about 10 people using C::B) the Release/Debug philosophy has paid off as it is what we use most. In *my* humble option this is a good default. But I'm not pushing anything here.
tiwag:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on October 13, 2006, 08:49:09 pm ---I didn't mean to offend here - I really wasn't sure if anybody is aware of the fact that indeed this is not a limitation of the scripted wizard plugin ...
--- End quote ---
surprisingly we now about that fact already
tiwag:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on October 13, 2006, 08:49:09 pm ---...For me at work (where round about 10 people using C::B) the Release/Debug philosophy has paid off as it is what we use most. In *my* humble option this is a good default.
--- End quote ---
and how do you organize a simple project which consists e.g. of
1 - wxScintilla
2 - your custom dll with all your old goodies
3 - your wx app
with the Release/Debug approach ?
do you use different projects for for 1,2,3 and a workspace to hold them ?
do you have 3 times more effort to set all needed settings than if you would use one project with targets 1,2,3
which is easily expandable too ?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: tiwag on October 13, 2006, 09:38:34 pm ---and how do you organize a simple project which consists e.g. of
1 - wxScintilla
2 - your custom dll with all your old goodies
3 - your wx app
--- End quote ---
In fact I have such a project. I organise these 3 points as projects. Each of these projects has a release and debug target and a virtual "all" that includes both. Maybe I don't get what you try to explain...?! :shock:
With regards, Morten.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version