User forums > Nightly builds

The 10 september 2006 build is out.

<< < (2/2)

byo:

--- Quote from: Alturin on September 10, 2006, 09:38:28 pm ---I build it from SVN, does it compile with/without the new wxSmith by default? And if so, how do I make it build without it?

--- End quote ---

if you compile all contrib plugins (using Contrib-Plugins workspace) you compile old wxSmith. New one is in separate directory (and it should be in separate branch soon), so there's nothing to worry about :)

jayatk:

--- Quote from: killerbot on September 10, 2006, 06:56:49 pm ---Typedefs parsing in code-completion is back again


--- End quote ---

It's back, but it's not quite working perfectly.  It can't parse typedef struct definitions in C too well.  I have a project with tons of typedef struct definitions, and the code completion still doesn't pick up on those struct variables. 

It would totally rock if this can be fixed for Codeblocks.

Keep up the good work!

mandrav:

--- Quote from: jayatk on September 11, 2006, 05:29:49 pm ---
--- Quote from: killerbot on September 10, 2006, 06:56:49 pm ---Typedefs parsing in code-completion is back again


--- End quote ---

It's back, but it's not quite working perfectly.  It can't parse typedef struct definitions in C too well.  I have a project with tons of typedef struct definitions, and the code completion still doesn't pick up on those struct variables. 

It would totally rock if this can be fixed for Codeblocks.

--- End quote ---


Take a look at this:


--- Quote from: comments in code-completion code ---
--- Code: (cpp) ---// "typedef struct" is not supported
// "typedef class" is not supported
// "typedef enum" is not supported
// "typedef union" is not supported

--- End code ---

--- End quote ---

It will be implemented later.

mmebane:

--- Quote from: killerbot on September 10, 2006, 06:56:49 pm ---Improvements in code-completion parsing

--- End quote ---

Hm, code-completion still misses variables declared on the first line of a function. Maybe an off-by-one error somewhere?

Anyway, thanks for all your hard work!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page