User forums > Nightly builds

The 29 august 2006 build is out.

<< < (2/4) > >>

Jewe:

--- Quote from: manmach on August 30, 2006, 08:27:49 am ---This is the first time I am trying to use wxSmith, but I find it completely unusable.

--- End quote ---

I have several interesting coversations with mandrav
and the conclusion:
It's hard for byo to work on the old code hunting bugs, when he created the new code for exactly this reason: to be manageable and easy to find/fix bugs.
Yes, wxSmith can crash C::B. But, at the same time, it works fine in most (simple, if you want) cases.
If it helps you, think of wxSmith as a technology preview. It's not a finished product in any way.

in the mean time I'm still waiting for my asdl connection so I can look at the newer version.
even thinking about helping out a little bit  :shock:
that is, if my personal life does not get in the way.  :D

cheers,

jewe

tiwag:

--- Quote from: manmach on August 30, 2006, 08:27:49 am ---I am just wondering though, are there no perfectly acceptable alternatives already? Open source or otherwise?

--- End quote ---

expecting a "perfect world" ??? huh  :shock:

but there is a good alternative available

wxformbuilder
http://www.wxformbuilder.org/

works very nice with CB

skirby:
Hello, I have reported a small bug with the tooltip in debbuging session (when you put your mouse over a variable)
See http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=3919.msg30927#msg30927

My previous example wasn't syntactically correct (problem with cast and pointer).
I have made a small correction but the problem still persits.
So, I think there is really a bug.


--- Code: ---#include <windows.h>

int main()
{
  HANDLE hTest;
  int iVar;

  iVar = 10;
  hTest = &iVar;

  return 0;
}

--- End code ---

Could you correct it in a future release.

Thanks and have a nice day.

tiwag:
i can confirm the bug reported by skirby

JPlaroche:

--- Quote from: Jewe on August 30, 2006, 08:54:13 am ---
--- Quote from: manmach on August 30, 2006, 08:27:49 am ---This is the first time I am trying to use wxSmith, but I find it completely unusable.

--- End quote ---

I have several interesting coversations with mandrav
and the conclusion:
It's hard for byo to work on the old code hunting bugs, when he created the new code for exactly this reason: to be manageable and easy to find/fix bugs.
Yes, wxSmith can crash C::B. But, at the same time, it works fine in most (simple, if you want) cases.
If it helps you, think of wxSmith as a technology preview. It's not a finished product in any way.

in the mean time I'm still waiting for my asdl connection so I can look at the newer version.
even thinking about helping out a little bit  :shock:
that is, if my personal life does not get in the way.  :D

cheers,

jewe

--- End quote ---



Je ne me sers pas de wxSmith il est trop simpliste,
je préfère de loin wxFormbuilder, dont l'activité est open source et avec le forum nouvellement ouvert il est permis
de penser à des plugins etc.......

Dommage que C::B  ....  bref l' historique oui... mais faut savoir tourner la page....


I do not serve myself any wxSmith it is too simplistic, I prefer by far wxFormbuilder, of which the activity open source and with the forum newly opened it is allowed
thinking about plugins etc. ...... 

Damage that C: : B....  Brief l' historic yes... but is necessary to know to turn the page. ... 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page