User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
I'm curious
PDEE:
Thanks Takeshi.
Moving from windows to linux is all different for me. Well at least i know why now. When i strip the file i get 4Kb :shock:. I'm going to read up some more on this.
Thank You
PDEE
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on July 21, 2006, 06:38:08 am ---The good thing is that there is always stlport.
You can link indeed to it dynamically with MinGW.
The OGRE guys use (in Windows) stlport over stdc++ for a couple of reasons. I've tested it and works without problems. :)
--- End quote ---
I tried that. However with Digital Mars (didn't try it with MinGW) it produced about the same size executable as MinGW with stdc++....... I may have to give it another go around. :)
takeshimiya:
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 21, 2006, 01:50:14 pm ---
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on July 21, 2006, 06:38:08 am ---The good thing is that there is always stlport.
You can link indeed to it dynamically with MinGW.
The OGRE guys use (in Windows) stlport over stdc++ for a couple of reasons. I've tested it and works without problems. :)
--- End quote ---
I tried that. However with Digital Mars (didn't try it with MinGW) it produced about the same size executable as MinGW with stdc++....... I may have to give it another go around. :)
--- End quote ---
Which makes perfect sense, since the stlport bundled with DMars is compiled statically.
But if you compile stlport and link to it dinamically, the situation will change :wink:
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on July 26, 2006, 01:11:23 am ---
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 21, 2006, 01:50:14 pm ---
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on July 21, 2006, 06:38:08 am ---The good thing is that there is always stlport.
You can link indeed to it dynamically with MinGW.
The OGRE guys use (in Windows) stlport over stdc++ for a couple of reasons. I've tested it and works without problems. :)
--- End quote ---
I tried that. However with Digital Mars (didn't try it with MinGW) it produced about the same size executable as MinGW with stdc++....... I may have to give it another go around. :)
--- End quote ---
Which makes perfect sense, since the stlport bundled with DMars is compiled statically.
But if you compile stlport and link to it dinamically, the situation will change :wink:
--- End quote ---
Oh ok I see. :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version