Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
New project wizard (Qt)
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 17, 2006, 09:43:42 pm ---Is Qt Windows only for MinGW?
--- End quote ---
The Open Source installer variant seems to be "optimised" (speak: compiled) for/with MinGW which seem to be logic for Open source application development, though. Anyway: The commercial variant supports and integrates into Visual Studio nicely.
Anyway: I'm not a QT developer so all this may be wrong... ;-)
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on July 17, 2006, 09:52:00 pm ---
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 17, 2006, 09:43:42 pm ---Is Qt Windows only for MinGW?
--- End quote ---
The Open Source installer variant seems to be "optimised" (speak: compiled) for/with MinGW which seem to be logic for Open source application development, though. Anyway: The commercial variant supports and integrates into Visual Studio nicely.
Anyway: I'm not a QT developer so all this may be wrong... ;-)
--- End quote ---
Ok. Thanks for the info. :) I'll upload the revised stuff soon. I'm really not sure what to validate the Qt location against though. :P Hints?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 17, 2006, 09:54:30 pm ---I'm really not sure what to validate the Qt location against though. :P Hints?
--- End quote ---
Hmmm... if I look at you main.cpp I'd say to verify the existence of /include, /include/qt and the main header file "qapplication.h" in that folder. (Which on second thought may be what you had in mind to verify?!).
Nice would be to verify if all thoise libaries the main application will be linked against are really required (I'm thinking of e.g. libQt3Support4 here). This seems to be an aweful lot. Finally you could verify that the main library (libQtCore4 or libqtmain - I really can't tell) is available and issue a descriptive message, if not. Anyway, maybe another (QT experienced) dev could answer this better. Who is the current maintainer of the QTWorkbench plugin? ...a forum search should reveal this... hopefully... ;-)
With regards, Morten.
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on July 17, 2006, 10:14:48 pm ---
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 17, 2006, 09:54:30 pm ---I'm really not sure what to validate the Qt location against though. :P Hints?
--- End quote ---
Hmmm... if I look at you main.cpp I'd say to verify the existence of /include, /include/qt and the main header file "qapplication.h" in that folder. (Which on second thought may be what you had in mind to verify?!).
Nice would be to verify if all thoise libaries the main application will be linked against are really required (I'm thinking of e.g. libQt3Support4 here). This seems to be an aweful lot. Finally you could verify that the main library (libQtCore4 or libqtmain - I really can't tell) is available and issue a descriptive message, if not. Anyway, maybe another (QT experienced) dev could answer this better. Who is the current maintainer of the QTWorkbench plugin? ...a forum search should reveal this... hopefully... ;-)
With regards, Morten.
--- End quote ---
Yop was the maintainer I thought...
Anyways new version. Maybe it will work now. :)
Forum won't let me upload. The upload folder is full. :P
Get it here.
EDIT:
Ok I modified the script some more. :)
The project created by the script pretty much mirrors the file-based one. Could someone that uses Qt try this please?
lfm:
thank you!
two question :
1.for windows, how to apply the patch file?
2.for QT4, no "/include/Qt/ActiveQt" ..., but have "/include/ActiveQt"
about this, please look here: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=3206.0
additional file is a qt4 project template.
[attachment deleted by admin]
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version