Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

New project wizard (Qt)

<< < (5/6) > >>

sethjackson:

--- Quote from: lfm on July 19, 2006, 02:41:09 am ---
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 19, 2006, 02:07:12 am ---Ok cool. :) lfm does it work for you now?

--- End quote ---
Now not found any problem!   :D

--- End quote ---

Great. :D

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 19, 2006, 02:07:12 am ---Ok cool. :) lfm does it work for you now?

--- End quote ---
It worked for me, too. I also like the new wizard's image!!!
Thus I've committed this to SVN after the following modifications:
- renamed to qt4 (because it isn't compatible with qt3 and in fact uses qt4 libs)
- using new verification scheme (using new global functions)
- removed unneccesary inlcude directories and libraries that were linked against to keep the project minimalistic

Thanks for help! Could you try to update from SVN and run it - if it works in this version too?

With regards, Morten.

lfm:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on July 19, 2006, 09:49:46 am ---- removed unneccesary inlcude directories and libraries that were linked against to keep the project minimalistic
Thanks for help! Could you try to update from SVN and run it - if it works in this version too?

--- End quote ---
works fine.
But I think that ought to add all inlcude directories and libraries, because add them manual is really troublesome, and this isn't increase the outfile's size.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: lfm on July 19, 2006, 10:21:51 am ---But I think that ought to add all inlcude directories and libraries, because add them manual is really troublesome, and this isn't increase the outfile's size.

--- End quote ---
Yes, but it also gives a false impression to users that all this is required and the dependencies are not getting clear. I think we can assume that if a user adds another functionality and receives a "Whatever.h include file not found" error he'll know what to do. In addition I searched through the Qt examples and they also not always include all directories and libs but only the required ones... so I thought it's better this way...?!
Are there other Qt devs arguing against this? All of them? ;-)

sethjackson:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on July 19, 2006, 09:49:46 am ---
--- Quote from: sethjackson on July 19, 2006, 02:07:12 am ---Ok cool. :) lfm does it work for you now?

--- End quote ---
It worked for me, too. I also like the new wizard's image!!!
Thus I've committed this to SVN after the following modifications:
- renamed to qt4 (because it isn't compatible with qt3 and in fact uses qt4 libs)
- using new verification scheme (using new global functions)
- removed unneccesary inlcude directories and libraries that were linked against to keep the project minimalistic

Thanks for help! Could you try to update from SVN and run it - if it works in this version too?

With regards, Morten.

--- End quote ---

I will try it out soon. Thanks for comitting. :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page