Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
wxScintilla 1.69.2 running with SVN head
Pecan:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 28, 2006, 04:34:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: thomas on June 28, 2006, 04:19:57 pm ---I just wondered if it really bears a significant advantage for us.
--- End quote ---
There were quite several unicode changes during the time of our last wxScintilla update. Meanwhile wxScintilla is released as "unicode stable"... for whatever that means...?! Which reminds me: I should try the unicode issue killerbot reported in another thread with this version of C::B of mine... I'll do so - if that works this would definetely be a reason to commit.
With regards, Morten.
--- End quote ---
To mention a caution here:
There is a serious bug with scintilla and gtk. Remember the double-click on marked-area hangs?
I can't determine if they fixed this. I submitted the patch that we use in CodeBlocks, but could never determine if they used it.
So I opine that some serious testing needs to be done before using new scintilla code.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Pecan on June 28, 2006, 04:49:11 pm ---I can't determine if they fixed this.
--- End quote ---
Good point! Where can I find the patch? Is it in the S::F bugtracker somewhere?
Edit: And by the way: I'm not in a hurry submitting this - it is completely untested (so far) under linux because I hadn't have time to compile. Before this I won't do anything anyway... I'm aware that this is a core component. Again: This is an informal message in the first place.
killerbot:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 28, 2006, 04:34:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: thomas on June 28, 2006, 04:19:57 pm ---I just wondered if it really bears a significant advantage for us.
--- End quote ---
There were quite several unicode changes during the time of our last wxScintilla update. Meanwhile wxScintilla is released as "unicode stable"... for whatever that means...?! Which reminds me: I should try the unicode issue killerbot reported in another thread with this version of C::B of mine... I'll do so - if that works this would definetely be a reason to commit.
With regards, Morten.
--- End quote ---
I will try it to, for the uncomment issue
Pecan:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 28, 2006, 04:52:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: Pecan on June 28, 2006, 04:49:11 pm ---I can't determine if they fixed this.
--- End quote ---
Good point! Where can I find the patch? Is it in the S::F bugtracker somewhere?
Edit: And by the way: I'm not in a hurry submitting this - it is completely untested (so far) under linux because I hadn't have time to compile. Before this I won't do anything anyway... I'm aware that this is a core component. Again: This is an informal message in the first place.
--- End quote ---
I submitted the patch to wxScintilla group.
It's still sitting at:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=141621&atid=753190
This is the patch we use to semi-avoid the gtk/wxScintilla hang.
http://developer.berlios.de/patch/index.php?func=detailpatch&patch_id=1037&group_id=5358
That berlios patch search mechanism is a pita. If you search for any/any/any patch, you can't find the accepted patches. Wierd.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Pecan on June 28, 2006, 05:15:26 pm ---I can't determine if they fixed this.
--- End quote ---
They did not. I've applied it within my local copy of 1.69.2... just to make sure. Thanks.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version