Thank you very much for this review! It works fine but debuging...
More precisely:
My system is ubuntu. The goal is to compile dll as a plugin for some windows application.
Following the instructions I was able to compile, link and to begin debugging. For debugging mingw32-gdb.exe under wine was used.
The C::B was able to put breakpoint but when the programm stops I have the following error in the debugger window: "The program has stopped on a breakpoint but the breakpoint format is not recognized".
In the source code (
http://fossies.org/dox/codeblocks-10.05-src/gdb__driver_8cpp_source.html) I found that this error message appears when the result output doesn't coincide with regexp either reBreak or reBreak_or32 (*). Manually I would say that this string should coincide with reBreak_or32 and, so, there is two cases why the error appears 1) somehow reBreak instead of reBreak_or32 is applied (I tried to change development flower in the C::B settings to 'or32' but nothing changed) 2) there are some invisible symbols which don't coincide with regexp
1) The further way of searching for the solution is to rebuild debuggergdb but how can I rebuild only that module and where should I put the rebuilt module?
2) What else can I do to make the debugger working?
(*) To the developers of debuggergdb, Just a curiosity:
Why you use this kind of code
43 #ifdef __WXMSW__
44 static wxRegEx reBreak(_T("([A-Za-z]*[:]*)([^:]+):([0-9]+):[0-9]+:[begmidl]+:(0x[0-9A-Fa-f]+)"));
45 static wxRegEx reBreak_or32(_T("\032\032([A-Za-z]:)([^:]+):([0-9]+):[0-9]+:[begmidl]+:(0x[0-9A-z]+)"));
46 #else
47 static wxRegEx reBreak(_T("\032\032([^:]+):([0-9]+):[0-9]+:[begmidl]+:(0x[0-9A-Fa-f]+)"));
48 static wxRegEx reBreak_or32(_T("")); // not used on linux, but make sure it exists otherwise compilation fails on linux (if (platform::windows) blabla)
49 #endif
and then trying to select the right version of reBreak or reBreake_or32 while it is mush more understandable to use one regex like this
static wxRegEx reBreak(_T("\{\032\032\}?(\{[A-Za-z]*[:]*\}?)([^:]+):([0-9]+):[0-9]+:[begmidl]+:(0x[0-9A-Fa-f]+)"));
The performance here seems to be not so much important...
