Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

New plugin committed

<< < (3/5) > >>

mandrav:
@michael: I confirm the wxXmlResource::Unload() problem in Ubuntu. I have #ifdef'd this line of code, but note that the second time you 'll run this wizard (in the same session) you may expect a crash because the loaded XRC will not be refreshed...

@morten: fixed, thanks.

@TDragon: remarks noted, thanks.

@all: thanks for the feedback guys :)

MortenMacFly:
I tried to implement the wizards for GLFW and GLUT, and: success. No I can really say: Nice work, though - easy to understand and really flexible.
How and when are other devs supposed to contribute (e.g. translate all other templates into wizards)? As a patch? Or is it better to wait with submitting new wizards - I'm thinking about the compiler framework overhaul here...?! (Because I believe the wizards will be changed slightly once this is done.)
With regards, Morten.

sethjackson:
Nice work.  8) I like it. :D

mandrav:

--- Quote ---How and when are other devs supposed to contribute (e.g. translate all other templates into wizards)? As a patch?
--- End quote ---

Initially I 'd like to identify potential pitfalls/shortcomings and fix them. Then we can convert the file-based templates to scripts :).
So if something seems to be missing here, please discuss it.


--- Quote ---I'm thinking about the compiler framework overhaul here...?! (Because I believe the wizards will be changed slightly once this is done.)
--- End quote ---

Most probably, only the way of setting compiler options might need update, i.e. not much.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: mandrav on April 18, 2006, 09:35:21 pm ---So if something seems to be missing here, please discuss it.

--- End quote ---
Ok, understood. From my point of view - after converting SmartWin and FLTK, too ;-) - I can say that for these examples it works very well... If you think of the wizards as a help for:
1.) setting up the and verify example requirements (headers, libs...),
2.) settings up and verifying the dev environment (Win/Linux/...; GCC/MSVC...) and then
3.) providing a readily setup, compilable and easy-to-understand example piece of code
I personally couldn't think of anything missing. But maybe I've chosen the easy ones... :oops:
Is there anything else the wizards could be good for that should be pointed out here?
With regards, Morten.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page