Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

New Class browser enhancements

<< < (2/4) > >>

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: mandrav on April 04, 2006, 03:55:45 pm ---[...] or take the risk knowingly :)

--- End quote ---
I used it the whole day today - no freezes. I guess the risk is quite small, isn't it?! ;-)
BTW: I saw revision 2295 by now, maybe you're refering to that.
Anyway - just take your time, this feature is really worth it. That's an really useful enhancement no other IDE I know provides! It's of that kind you never know that you need it until you've used it the first time - then you'll never want to work without it...
With regards, Morten.

MortenMacFly:
Well... I've just updated to revision 2296. Now C::B crashes on exit if I have had a project opened. This does not happen if I do not open a project. I tried a full rebuild - no luck. I've attached the report file C::B creates - it seems the destructor of the classbrowser fails, but this is just one line of code?! Any thoughts on that?
With regards, Morten.

PS.: BTW: I've applied patch #982 (http://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=982&group_id=5358) but even if I remove the patch C::B still crashes.

Edit: I forgot to add: Version 1.0 revision 2296 (gcc 3.4.5 Windows/unicode, build: Apr  4 2006 20:01:46).

[attachment deleted by admin]

Michael:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on April 04, 2006, 08:25:26 pm ---Well... I've just updated to revision 2296. Now C::B crashes on exit if I have had a project opened.
Edit: I forgot to add: Version 1.0 revision 2296 (gcc 3.4.5 Windows/unicode, build: Apr  4 2006 20:01:46).

--- End quote ---

Hello,

I have just build C::B rev2296 (gcc 4.1.0 - wxWidgets 2.6.3-RC1) and I can partially confirm the crash. I have started C::B, opened a project and then exit C::B with File-->Quit, but no crash. I have re-tried with the same project, but this time by using the X button to exit C::B and still no crash. Then I have tried with another project and when exit C::B with File-->Quit, I have had no crash. But when I have used the X button to exit C::B, then I have had the crash :(.

It seems that in my configuration the crash did not always occur... :roll:

Best wishes,
Michael

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Michael on April 04, 2006, 09:38:53 pm ---But when I have used the X button to exit C::B, then I have had the crash :(.

--- End quote ---
That's partially right! If I use the "Quit" from the "File" menu I have no crash message, too. Anyway: A codeblocks.rpt file is still being created silently. If I use the "X" I get the crash and a message and the codeblocks.rpt file is created, too. Strange!
With regards, Morten.

Ps.: Slightly off-topic:

--- Quote from: Michael on April 04, 2006, 09:38:53 pm ---I have just build C::B rev2296 (gcc 4.1.0 - wxWidgets 2.6.3-RC1) and I can partially confirm the
--- End quote ---
Are you aware that 2.6.3 is officially released (including 2 patches already)? There is no need for RC1 anymore. ;-)

Michael:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on April 04, 2006, 09:52:32 pm ---
--- Quote from: Michael on April 04, 2006, 09:38:53 pm ---But when I have used the X button to exit C::B, then I have had the crash :(.

--- End quote ---
That's partially right! If I use the "Quit" from the "File" menu I have no crash message, too. Anyway: A codeblocks.rpt file is still being created silently. If I use the "X" I get the crash and a message and the codeblocks.rpt file is created, too. Strange!

--- End quote ---

I have had a look at your and my RPT and they look different :?. I will attach mine here.


--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on April 04, 2006, 09:52:32 pm ---Ps.: Slightly off-topic:

--- Quote from: Michael on April 04, 2006, 09:38:53 pm ---I have just build C::B rev2296 (gcc 4.1.0 - wxWidgets 2.6.3-RC1) and I can partially confirm the
--- End quote ---
Are you aware that 2.6.3 is officially released (including 2 patches already)? There is no need for RC1 anymore. ;-)

--- End quote ---

Yes, I know. I am just a bit too busy. I will do it tomorrow and for the same occasion trying the GCC 4.1.0's workaround :).


[attachment deleted by admin]

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version