User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)

New wxWidgets 2.6.3-RC2

<< < (2/2)

Michael:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 20, 2006, 07:00:54 pm ---Yes, the toolbar problems remain. It's exactly the same, they are too wide as in your post. :-(
With regards, Morten.

--- End quote ---

Thank you very much for your feedback :). I have also asked in the wxAUI forum, but it seems that it is not wxAUI the cause :(.

Best wishes,
Michael

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Michael on March 20, 2006, 07:10:02 pm ---Thank you very much for your feedback :).

--- End quote ---
You're welcome. Please have a look in this topic where I may have made progress...?!
http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php?topic=2331.0
With regards, Morten.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Michael on March 20, 2006, 07:10:02 pm ---but it seems that it is not wxAUI the cause :(.

--- End quote ---
For now I'd say it is wxAUI. The value for bestw - the best width for the toolbar - is calculated wrong. It is always computed to the value 792 - whyever. This is part of wxAUI, you'll find the code in manager.cpp.
I don't know yet where exactly this happens, I'm still digging into this...
With regards, Morten.

Michael:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on March 20, 2006, 07:43:35 pm ---
--- Quote from: Michael on March 20, 2006, 07:10:02 pm ---but it seems that it is not wxAUI the cause :(.

--- End quote ---
For now I'd say it is wxAUI. The value for bestw - the best width for the toolbar - is calculated wrong. It is always computed to the value 792 - whyever. This is part of wxAUI, you'll find the code in manager.cpp.
I don't know yet where exactly this happens, I'm still digging into this...
With regards, Morten.

--- End quote ---

Hmmm. Personally, I do not exclude wxAUI to be guilty, anyway, this is the answer I have got from Alex Bligh:


--- Quote ---I have. It works fine. I've done the largest number of tests with the patches at http://www.alex.org.uk/wxAUI/index.html applied, but even without them, I've at least tried the sample application and it's OK.

--- End quote ---

Best wishes,
Michael

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Michael on March 20, 2006, 08:19:07 pm ---Hmmm. Personally, I do not exclude wxAUI to be guilty, anyway, this is the answer I have got from
--- Quote ---I have. It works fine. I've done the largest number of tests with the patches at http://www.alex.org.uk/wxAUI/index.html applied, but even without them, I've at least tried the sample application and it's OK.

--- End quote ---

--- End quote ---
I can confirm this - I tried myself. And in the other topic Thomas pointed out that he also believes it's not an wxAUI issue. He also explained, why... I guess... I didn't really get it... :oops: :lol:
With regards, Morten.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page