User forums > Nightly builds

The 05 march 2006 build is out.

<< < (3/4) > >>

thomas:
Well, I have no idea what the deal with that D code is (not using D), but gcc works.
Right now, I've had it compile a file that contained the line
printf("%s %d %f", %s, %d, %f);
which will quite obviously generate an error , and that works just fine.

skirby:
Hi,

I have a strange behavior for my toolbar.
On Windows XP all is correct but on windows 2000, the "Build target" combo box is cut (see screenshot)

Is it a bug?

Thanks and have a nice day.

skirby:
Hello,

Is it normal that the background of icons in "General Settings" and all others dialog boxes is black on Windows 2000 while it is transparency on Windows XP?
It is not a bug, just a cosmetic problem (not really important)

Thanks ans have a nice day.

thomas:

--- Quote from: skirby on March 06, 2006, 09:54:11 am ---Is it a bug?
--- End quote ---
Yes, in Windows 2000.

szczepan:

--- Quote from: killerbot on March 05, 2006, 10:37:23 pm ---Resolved Fixed:


* Added EditorHooks for modules to hook on editor events. Currently only
wxEVT_SCI_CHARADDED is forwarded to hooks
* ...
* Removed SDK events cbEVT_EDITOR_AUTOCOMPLETE, cbEVT_EDITOR_CALLTIP and
cbEVT_EDITOR_USERLIST_SELECTION
* Added new SDK event cbEVT_APP_UPDATE_TITLE to notify the main app to
update its title etc. Currently not handled...
* ...

--- End quote ---

I would call these major feature additions, not "Resolved/Fixed". If we keep adding major features at the "release candidate" stage, we will go to the asymptotic Dev-C++ hell (v1.0RC1, v1.0RC2, v1.0RC3, v1.0RC3.1, v1.0RC3.1b1, v1.0RC3.1b2, v1.0RC3.1b2.99999999) and never quite arrive at v1.0. Do we have the guts to just say NO MORE FEATURES and make a SVN branch for what will become v1.1 and say NEW FEATURES HERE PLEASE?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page