So what DOES moving to Git depend on?
It depends on the development team deciding that moving to git, github, gitlab or anything like that is worth the effort and it is beneficial.
I want to do THAT along ...
It is not up to you to do that or to decide it at. At least at the moment.
If you contribute enough good work you can request being added to the development team.
I like full IDE's and CB. I really don't want this project to be a relic any longer.
It will stop being a relic if people work more on it. Your proposition is that the use of svn/sf.net stops quality work being contributed.
I don't believe this to be true and it is hard to measure it, so it is for you hard to prove it. And we're actually on github and we're actually using git...
I don't think bug fixes and QOL improvements will fix that, I think it needs more radical change. But that's just me.
So you think that switching to git magically would make the debugger plugin to actually work in the real world?
Or it will auto integrate something like LSP to make CC support C++2099?
Or it will make the build system to utilize modern mutli-core cpus?
Or it will add better cmake/meson support...
I'm out of this topic. If you want to discuss your cmake contribution please start new one.