User forums > Nightly builds
The 22 february 2006 build is out.
mandrav:
--- Quote ---Now since I can't specify a working folder for the Make command...
--- End quote ---
Submit a feature request.
killerbot:
--- Quote from: orefa on February 24, 2006, 12:02:17 am ---
--- Quote from: killerbot on February 23, 2006, 11:10:39 pm ---are these headers part of the project (so they show up in the project tree) ?? or are they include in project code, but the header is actually not specified in the project itself ??
--- End quote ---
They are part of the project. Headers that are not listed in the tree would not be saved even in the RC2 version, but now it does not seem to matter if they are in the project or not, they are not saved when the corresponding .cpp file is compiled. They are saved when the full project is build. It's only with compilation of an individual .cpp file that it's a (lesser) problem, but still a bit annoying.
--- End quote ---
fixed in revision 2076
boaz:
--- Quote from: mandrav on February 24, 2006, 10:30:45 pm ---Submit a feature request.
--- End quote ---
That still will not solve the problem because gcc 3.4 outputs its messages from inside build\msw folder but C::B expects messages relative to its project-file which is 2 folders below. Since it is an external makefile how can C::B figure what's going on.
I don't get it with the GCC people. It's like they are out there to make all our lives hell. CB is not the only one with this problem. KDevelop and dev_c++ have the same problem. Some smart ass person decided to change the output of GCC and who cares about all these thousand of man work hours out there. Hell, most common practice on the gnu world is a recursive makefile system, where root makefile invokes child makefiles. Now how can an IDE figure that out if the relative folder is constantly changing?
"Look Mom, I just busted all these IDE lazy bastards to bits. I'm so full of myself" That’s grate change the only API interface with gcc, stdin/stdout, bust all users out there and "make a command line switch?" "No, your kidding, us? We are the GCC overlords we rule the world, haven't you herd?"
Oof that felt gooood. It is my opinion that GCC is the one single bad thing in OSS that is constantly wasting all our time over and over again. There must come up an alternative
Free life
Boaz Harrosh
orefa:
--- Quote from: killerbot on February 25, 2006, 02:28:10 pm ---
--- Quote from: orefa on February 24, 2006, 12:02:17 am ---
--- Quote from: killerbot on February 23, 2006, 11:10:39 pm ---are these headers part of the project (so they show up in the project tree) ?? or are they include in project code, but the header is actually not specified in the project itself ??
--- End quote ---
They are part of the project. Headers that are not listed in the tree would not be saved even in the RC2 version, but now it does not seem to matter if they are in the project or not, they are not saved when the corresponding .cpp file is compiled. They are saved when the full project is build. It's only with compilation of an individual .cpp file that it's a (lesser) problem, but still a bit annoying.
--- End quote ---
fixed in revision 2076
--- End quote ---
Great, thank you! :)
Jorg:
Thanks Seth I am so sorry I didn't replied earlier, the Thunderbird spam is too greedy and I didn't noticed thje reply email was in there..
Looking forward to the next version!
- Jorgen
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version