User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)

Doxygen comment addin idea

<< < (4/4)

takeshimiya:
No, I think the point is, C::B will be C::B. If it happens that most features are simmilar, it's just coincidence. It's not intended to be a clone of it.

Anyways, if I were looking after IDE features to implement, it would be IntelliJ IDEA, not MSVC.

FocusedWolf:
Just my opinion, having never used it, but it's appearence is very vs like. Atleast SharpDevelop like, which is vs like...like second derivative of vs. http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/features/screenshots/interface.gif

Hmm yes should implement all it's features  :) , especially themes hehe

thomas:

--- Quote from: FocusedWolf on February 17, 2006, 05:14:34 pm ---So saying you don't want a vs clone is saying you don't want to implement good features of every opensource text editor or ide in existence...just some...like collapsable text, class view, auto-complete, etc. Is that right?
--- End quote ---
(underlining added)

That phrase seriously makes me wonder whether you have actually ever used Code::Blocks, or whether you are just trolling.

Actually, you cannot possibly have looked at Code::Blocks before, or else you would know that all of this is certainly implemented.

The statement about not wanting to implement good features generally does not need any further comment, I trust?

takeshimiya:

--- Quote from: FocusedWolf on February 17, 2006, 05:25:34 pm ---Just my opinion, having never used it, but it's appearence is very vs like. Atleast SharpDevelop like, which is vs like...like second derivative of vs. http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/features/screenshots/interface.gif

Hmm yes should implement all it's features  :) , especially themes hehe

--- End quote ---

It's obvious that the appearences of all IDEs will be simmilar.

But it's not about the appearences, instead about the features.

Just really want to look at this: http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/training/demos/overview.html

FocusedWolf:
I have used codeblocks, and those features in C::B was what i was trying to point out. I was saying, you got this, this, and this... all that's left is a few features and you have a vs clone. Then i was saying, is that as far as you want to go? Because the features that make up a "vs clone" are good features that have roots in open source software.

This thread is getting pointless i sense, i should of just said "themes would be cool" and left vs cloning out of it  :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page