User forums > Using Code::Blocks

Keyboard shortcut and C::B translation problem

<< < (3/4) > >>

oBFusCATed:
I plan to fix the conflicts soon. Any opinions about the changes in accelerators?

Pecan:

--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on June 10, 2019, 08:00:23 pm ---I plan to fix the conflicts soon. Any opinions about the changes in accelerators?

--- End quote ---


--- Quote ---Quote from: killerbot on June 10, 2019, 05:36:01 am
indeed, what is the official statement on this, what do we suggest.
I think Pecan, you are best suited on this topic ?

--- End quote ---
Yes, head actually contains those accelerator conflicts. It's not new, it's just that cbKeyBinder 2.0 now catches them.  The second accelerator of the conflicts will never be executed and the user never knew it.

I suggest that "File/New/Empty file" be changed to Ctrl-N .

"Show/Tooltip" is defined as Alt-Shift-Space; so I suggest that "Edit/Previous call tip" be changed to Alt-Shift-P and "Edit/Next call tip" be changed to Alt-Shift-N for consistency in that area of the menus.

I suggest that "Search/Open Include file" be changed to Ctrl-Shift-O .

Except for Ctrl-N, the above suggested accelerlators are not currently being used.

oBFusCATed:
I'm not sure I get a conflict on New file.

Btw: there is this report https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/840/ and I also had some error messages about bindings failing to load/save.

Pecan:

--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on June 12, 2019, 08:42:52 pm ---I'm not sure I get a conflict on New file.

Btw: there is this report https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/840/ and I also had some error messages about bindings failing to load/save.

--- End quote ---

Sorry, my error, I was using a modified personality.

So, I suggest that "Edit/Previous Call tip" be changed to use Ctrl-Shift-P .
And that "Search/Open include file: be changed to use Ctrl-Shift-O

oBFusCATed:
I don't like that Next call tip will be ctrl-n and prev call tip would be ctrl-shift-p. I'd rather change both. Or just remove the shortcuts. I didn't know these existed, I'm using up and down arrows, they work just fine, not sure what is the benefit of using the shortcuts.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version