Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign

New code completion plugin w/ refactoring

<< < (5/9) > >>

rickg22:
Same here. Please get well!

Ptomaine:
Don't you see what's happenning, guys?
We just talk too much and nothing is going to be done.
Blah-blah-blah. People just come and go.

Arto. Get well, be careful and do not snivel. Join us again as soon as possible. It takes too much time to transfer your work on others' shoulders. If you cannot operate with your hands so you can speak anyway. For instance, you can help us in source code reviews or you can control the programming process by making your architectual amendments and improvements while you are getting well. Anyway, if you are really interested in this "child"'s growth you CAN do something. Do not sit about.

Do not just talk. We all know that we really NEED code completion and refactoring tools (plugins or whatsoever) with the minimum sufficient functionalities. Just keep in mind to improve it with the multilingual possibilities and so on but JUST KEEP IN MIND. Anyway, the sooner we'll have some sane code completion and refactoring tools the sooner we'll be able to improve them with their own help :) Honestly, the present code completion tool is just a disaster. Just look inside the "UltimateCPP IDE's Code Assistant" code to learn how the open source code completion tool might work (no ad.).

I do not want to be rude, guys, but time is going fast and it won't be waiting for us while we are making conversations. We must be flexible and that's it for now. While we're deciding "milk or water" other competitive products are going on and smiling while passing us by.

Sorry guys. It seethed up.

Michael:

--- Quote from: Ptomaine on March 21, 2006, 01:19:39 am ---Don't you see what's happenning, guys?
We just talk too much and nothing is going to be done.
Blah-blah-blah. People just come and go.

--- End quote ---

Sorry, but I am quite shocked by your post :shock:.

First of all, I find that the devs of Code::Blocks are doing a great work :D. Morevover, they work in their free time and they get not paid for it.

Second, I do not like to much to always ask for new features, bug fixes, and so on without trying to contribute to the project. Consequently, I try to help as I can in my free and not free time :D.

Third, it is true that code completion needs some improvments, but anyway, it is not so bad. Rickg22 did a good job with it :D. Arto has had an accident (I hope he will get well soon). If not I am sure he would have done a good job.

And also, help is welcome :D. May be you can help in developing the code completion or taking the work initially started by Arto :).

Best wishes,
Michael 

Ptomaine:

--- Quote from: Michael on March 21, 2006, 11:28:06 am ---Sorry, but I am quite shocked by your post :shock:.

--- End quote ---

That's alright. Sometimes it is very good for our health to be shoked (adrenaline, you know) :)


--- Quote from: Michael on March 21, 2006, 11:28:06 am ---First of all, I find that the devs of Code::Blocks are doing a great work :D. Morevover, they work in their free time and they get not paid for it.

--- End quote ---

My big respect to all of devs. But the difference between October's RC2 and the most recent one is quite small. I don't feel relief from version to version. I don't care how much IDE is looking good, but I care the functionalities it offers. Wrong development accents?


--- Quote from: Michael on March 21, 2006, 11:28:06 am ---Second, I do not like to much to always ask for new features, bug fixes, and so on without trying to contribute to the project. Consequently, I try to help as I can in my free and not free time :D.

--- End quote ---

Applauses. But I prefer to do things that I can do best. If I have no idea how refactoring or effective parcer work than I will not begin to do this because others already have some good ideas on this account. So, why to create doubts and chaos? Donation? :)


--- Quote from: Michael on March 21, 2006, 11:28:06 am ---Third, it is true that code completion needs some improvments, but anyway, it is not so bad. Rickg22 did a good job with it :D. Arto has had an accident (I hope he will get well soon). If not I am sure he would have done a good job.

--- End quote ---

Aha. I always turn this plugin off because it slows down my programming but it's supposed to make programming faster! When I download a new version of Code::Blocks, in hope, the first thing I do is turning the code completion plugin on, testing it for a minute and than turning it off again. Know why, because it's not helping me but slowing down my work. I need it but I cannot work faster with the present version of the plugin.


--- Quote from: Michael on March 21, 2006, 11:28:06 am ---And also, help is welcome :D. May be you can help in developing the code completion or taking the work initially started by Arto :).

--- End quote ---

I'm kind of a sound programmer :). Will multimedia save the world and relief the pain? :)


--- Quote from: Michael on March 21, 2006, 11:28:06 am ---Best wishes,
Michael 

--- End quote ---

Thank you, Michael, for your respond. I really like the way you've tried to protect development and to argue back to me, but...
All the best to you.

thomas:
You do have a couple of valid points in your original post, although I cannot agree with it as a whole. In particular the fact that Arto had his accident is a rather unpleasant condition (mostly for him), so I perceive the above as a bit upsetting.

But then this line is simply funny:

--- Quote ---But the difference between October's RC2 and the most recent one is quite small. I don't feel relief from version to version.
--- End quote ---
Not sure whether or not to take that statement for serious... an ousider might be tempted to believe that you have never used a recent build. :)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version