Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
Compiling the recent revisions on Linux
thomas:
--- Quote from: yop on February 06, 2006, 10:05:41 pm ---But even if I do who 'll provide you with the info for compilers that don't support pch? :lol:
--- End quote ---
True :lol:
But hey, 4 versus 25 minutes is quite convincing, I knew it was somewhat faster, but not that much :)
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: thomas on February 06, 2006, 10:07:25 pm ---But hey, 4 versus 25 minutes is quite convincing, I knew it was somewhat faster, but not that much :)
--- End quote ---
:shock: When is GCC 4 (MinGW) coming out for us Windoze users I wonder?
thomas:
If I have understood correctly, never.
Some 6 months or so ago, I read that the MinGW team would not port gcc 4.0 at all (don't remember if that info was official or inofficial). Instead, they will (according to what I read) wait for 4.1 or 4.2 to be stable and go for that then.
sethjackson:
Oh I see I have awhile to wait then. :P
yop:
And the last one (sorry I got stuck on the last one and didn't finish make) to build flawlesly, (this file does not use #ifndef CB_PRECOMP so you'll get the double header parsing I'm afraid):
--- Code: (diff) ---Index: src/plugins/compilergcc/compilergcc.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/plugins/compilergcc/compilergcc.cpp (revision 1953)
+++ src/plugins/compilergcc/compilergcc.cpp (working copy)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#include <editormanager.h>
#include <scriptingmanager.h>
#include <configurationpanel.h>
-
+#include <pluginmanager.h>
#include <cbeditor.h>
#include <annoyingdialog.h>
#include <wx/xrc/xmlres.h>
--- End code ---
--- Quote from: thomas on February 06, 2006, 10:07:25 pm ---But hey, 4 versus 25 minutes is quite convincing, I knew it was somewhat faster, but not that much :)
--- End quote ---
Please don't tempt me, you know what it means to switch compilers to an rpm based installation... (especially when no official rpms are available)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version