Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Plugins development
QtWorkbench plugin
Michael:
Hello,
I just wonder if it would be possible to add the QtWorkbench plugin to the contr. plugins. It seems that several users are interested in it and in Qt. IMHO it would be a nice addition to C::B and would solve the problem of a pre-compiled release.
What do you think about?
Best wishes,
Michael
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: yop on April 19, 2006, 06:15:29 pm ---P.S. Morten's .zip has exactly the same sources as the one in the first post with the major difference that Morten put it in the contrib plugins so it should be easier to build and integrade it with C::B. I'll also keep that approach from now on
--- End quote ---
That's right. If you could (in addition) follow the other plugins concerning the directory structure, too? Thus, have only one base folder with the sources and a single sub-folder for the resources. That would be great... (not pushing anything here, just trying to be consistent with other's work).
With regards, Morten.
Ps.: BTW: I'd vote for integration in SVN, too... but that's only me.
yop:
--- Quote from: Michael on April 19, 2006, 08:09:30 pm ---...I just wonder if it would be possible to add the QtWorkbench plugin to the contr. plugins. It seems that several users are interested in it and in Qt. IMHO it would be a nice addition to C::B and would solve the problem of a pre-compiled release...
--- End quote ---
Yiannis has already shown that he has Qt development on his mind. Let's wait for the new compiler framework, this plugin might get obsolete. It could serve the users that need to use qmake for their projects or change to a RAD Qt plugin (I have some ideas but it would introduce Qt dependencies, we 'll see). Anyway Ephialtes will be afriend of Qt :)
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on April 19, 2006, 08:17:29 pm ---That's right. If you could (in addition) follow the other plugins concerning the directory structure, too? Thus, have only one base folder with the sources and a single sub-folder for the resources. That would be great... (not pushing anything here, just trying to be consistent with other's work).
--- End quote ---
I will, your solution has many advantages
Michael:
--- Quote from: yop on April 20, 2006, 10:32:25 am ---
--- Quote from: Michael on April 19, 2006, 08:09:30 pm ---...I just wonder if it would be possible to add the QtWorkbench plugin to the contr. plugins. It seems that several users are interested in it and in Qt. IMHO it would be a nice addition to C::B and would solve the problem of a pre-compiled release...
--- End quote ---
Yiannis has already shown that he has Qt development on his mind. Let's wait for the new compiler framework, this plugin might get obsolete. It could serve the users that need to use qmake for their projects or change to a RAD Qt plugin (I have some ideas but it would introduce Qt dependencies, we 'll see). Anyway Ephialtes will be afriend of Qt :)
--- End quote ---
Ok, I understand. Until now I use custom build for Qt, but it is not very practical to add manually moc'ed files to the project.
Let's we wait for the new compiler framework and see after how Qt could be used with C::B :).
Best wishes,
Michael
ldindon:
I hope that the new compiler framework will permits a better integration of Qt in C::B because, unfortunatly, the plugin (yet and for me) is too limited.
A better integration could be that it could be possible to open .pro file directly with C::B (I guess I dream to much...)
Another solution, could be (like decpp plugin) to have "import from .pro / export to .pro" options.
Another quick alternative could be that we will be able to specify a .pro to the plugin and that he only manages SOURCES and HEADERS .pro entries according to file add/remove in C::B project. Other qmake options could be managed by hand (allow to use whole power of qmake). The plugin could be in charge to setup C::B (ie: add the pre-build command "qmake <custom.pro>" to generate the Makefile and check "use a existing makefile"). Thus we will be able to use C::B original "Build", "Clean" commands.
That's just ideas, I discover C::B yesterday, so I don't have enough knowledge to know if it could be possible or not...(or probably stupid :))
Working on a cross-platform IDE with Qt is crutial for me, so maybe (If you and my boss agree) I may contribute to this Qt integration.
Best regards.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version