User forums > Using Code::Blocks

gfortran TDM 5.1 problem

<< < (2/2)

stahta01:

--- Quote from: grem on June 29, 2018, 02:23:52 am ---What about updating/replacing "codeblocks-17.12mingw_fortran-setup.exe" with updated TDM MinGW librariy as current binary contains such serious problem?

What will the replacement of TDM in future? Does it planning to replace it with MinGW64 as currently as I see the TDM development is frozen?

--- End quote ---

I think we should remove the "codeblocks-17.12mingw_fortran-setup.exe" from the download site.

gd_on:

--- Quote ---I think we should remove the "codeblocks-17.12mingw_fortran-setup.exe" from the download site.
--- End quote ---
I think a better solution is to propose a recent MinGW version : may be 7.3 (or 8.1, but may be too new !). Personnaly, I have projects mixing C, C++ and fortran codes, in 32 and/or 64 bits. So, I need an homogeneous solution.
What is your feeling devs ?
What is the best solution ?
Which one to choose between pure 32 bits solution, or 64 bits ones ?
If I look at the number of downloads, it looks that for 64 bit, a good choice is seh, posix and for pure 32 bits it's dwarf, posix.
If for 64 bits, it's looks compatible with TDM choices, for pure 32 bits, it's different with TDM choices I think.
Could someone explain in simple words the advantage of the different choices ?
Thanks,
gd_on

brianpt:
Let me try the new compiler.  It is unbelievable that such a little bug can kill my code.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page