Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

Building C::B with GCC 4.1.0

<< < (2/6) > >>

Ceniza:

--- Quote from: Michael ---I will check your post.
--- End quote ---

I think that's not possible. When I said "developers forum" I meant "developers only forum". I wonder if I also named it in the public thread :P

You'ren't missing anything really. I just named the problem, why and where it happened, but the only interest shown there was how I got to compile GCC 4.1.0 :)

I also hope your patch be accepted. It seems to be a matter of just a few weeks for GCC 4.1.0 final to be released, and it'll be surely available for Linux users first making Code::Blocks difficult to build there.

killerbot:
now just the guys ate MingW need to catch up. Some weeks ago they proposed 3.4.5 :-(
We want the 4.x .

thomas:

--- Quote ---You'ren't missing anything really. I just named the problem, why and where it happened, but the only interest shown there was how I got to compile GCC 4.1.0 Smile
--- End quote ---
And I still have not managed to compile it... :(

Michael:

--- Quote from: Ceniza on February 02, 2006, 04:03:41 pm ---
--- Quote from: Michael ---I will check your post.
--- End quote ---

I think that's not possible. When I said "developers forum" I meant "developers only forum". I wonder if I also named it in the public thread :P

--- End quote ---

Ah ok, I understand :D.


--- Quote from: Ceniza on February 02, 2006, 04:03:41 pm ---You'ren't missing anything really. I just named the problem, why and where it happened, but the only interest shown there was how I got to compile GCC 4.1.0 :)

--- End quote ---

Could be this piece of information made available? It would be really good :D.


--- Quote from: Ceniza on February 02, 2006, 04:03:41 pm ---I also hope your patch be accepted. It seems to be a matter of just a few weeks for GCC 4.1.0 final to be released, and it'll be surely available for Linux users first making Code::Blocks difficult to build there.

--- End quote ---

The patch was nothing particular. Just taking out the offending "extra qualification" errors. And testing if the modifications done were still backward compatible with GCC3.4.4. That was all :).

Michael

pandapanda:

--- Quote from: Michael on February 01, 2006, 07:17:14 pm ---Hello,

I have tried to compile C::B + contrib. plugins with GCC 4.1.0 (from Ceniza) and it worked quite well :D. I got a lot of warnings regarding wxWidgets (I think that Ceniza said already something about this). Especially of this type:

Best wishes,
Michael


--- End quote ---

you said "I have tried to compile C::B + contrib. plugins with GCC 4.1.0 (from Ceniza) and it worked quite well", can you tell me how to use this GCC 4.1.0 with step by step?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version