User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
multilib mingw-w64 TDM compiler
reckless:
Since TDM seems to have dissapeared :-\ i decided to make a new build of his multilib compiler for mingw-w64.
gcc version is at 6.4.0 and since im using the mingw-builds build scripts as a base, it follows the mingw-builds directory structure (so no lib something _64).
This means that it is quite a bit easier to work with, the downside is that you will have dll's in some odd places like /mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/lib.
The compiler defaults to linking statically to libgcc / libstdc++ and still supports throwing exceptions from static libgcc / libstdc++ like TDM's.
The packaged gdb uses mingw-w64 built python for pretty printing via a wrapper for gdb.
I will upload my gcc-6.4.0 builds shortly + build scripts. Just laying the final hand on the build scripts for previous versions of gcc for good measure :).
Earlier versions of gcc might not sound like something that will be used much, but in some cases you run into sources that only build with earlier versions of gcc, in which case this comes in handy indeed.
Links will be posted in this thread when done.
BlueHazzard:
and i am sitting here with gcc4.9 xD
reckless:
Time for an upgrade then ! ;D .
gcc-6.4.0 dual target should soon be up. atm i have problems building gnat due to the bootstrap compiler being to old (gcc-4.9.2) but c,c++,fortran,lto all work.
And yes you can cross build from a 32 bit OS to a 64 bit one and vice versa with these :), but its kinda moot if you cannot test your 64 bit builds on a 64 bit machine i think.
Also be aware that g++'s std changed quite a bit since version 4 or 5 for that matter, it now defaults to c++14 in version 6.
packages should be up by tomorrow. You can also use these as replacements for Msys2's mingw-w64 compilers if you like :).
reckless:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cbadvanced/files/MinGW%20Builds/TDM/
build scripts will be up later, takes some time to adjust TDM's patchsets for every concievable gcc version out there ;D
BlueHazzard:
The naming is quite odd... Is the "i686-w64-" part really needed?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version