User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
istringstream : bug @ MS
Game_Ender:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on January 31, 2006, 09:01:36 pm ---If it's a bug in their STL implementation, just use STLPort (of course, that is, if you really like (or need) to use the M$ free compiler).
--- End quote ---
Thank you I should of thought of that myself. The main reason I am toying with VS 2005 is because the when I using Code::Blocks with the VC 2003 toolkit the debugger keeps flaking out on me and I really need to finish my project. So I need a slightly more reliable tool.
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: killerbot on January 31, 2006, 10:23:36 pm ---yes then it works, and if you repalce the , by a . it also works. The string is not the poblem, the instringstream can't handle things right anymore, where it did in .NET 2003. Stupid M$
--- End quote ---
Do you really need to be told that is not a bug but a feature (NOT)....... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Michael:
--- Quote from: killerbot on January 31, 2006, 10:23:36 pm ---The string is not the poblem, the instringstream can't handle things right anymore, where it did in .NET 2003. Stupid M$
--- End quote ---
Did you try just with the Express Edition or with the other versions too (e.g., Professional)? May be it is just a problem related to the Express Edition.
--- Quote from: killerbot on January 31, 2006, 10:23:36 pm ---Stupid M$
--- End quote ---
Agree :D.
Michael
Der Meister:
Here is the bug report for this issue:
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback/viewfeedback.aspx?feedbackid=724641c1-bfd9-4105-99b7-000e5024b64f
George Mileka's argument looks quite good and this was also the first thing that came to my mind. But it seems as we both were wrong and this is really a bug. Anyway, there is also a workaround given and they already fixed this bug - but it will only come with the next major release, whatever/whenever this will be...
And please do me a favor - stop this silly MS-blaming... Especially this one is a small bug that probably comes from a misunderstandig of the standard (and the standard is not always easy to understand - especially not in this case). Apart from this, Microsoft Visual Studio is still a very good IDE (in my opinion even the best one, sorry folks...)
Michael:
--- Quote from: Der Meister on February 01, 2006, 11:50:54 am ---And please do me a favor - stop this silly MS-blaming... Especially this one is a small bug that probably comes from a misunderstandig of the standard (and the standard is not always easy to understand - especially not in this case). Apart from this, Microsoft Visual Studio is still a very good IDE (in my opinion even the best one, sorry folks...)
--- End quote ---
Generally speaking, Visual Studio is a good IDE. I used it before C::B (and still use if requested in projects) and I felt relative comfortable with it. Regarding the bug and the misunderstanding of the standard I am not sure. M$ actively partipates to the C++ standardization process and C++ experts are working for M$. Moreover, M$ has not a good reputation, e.g., check for example with MPEG and MPEG-4. Anyway, this is just my opinion and not a beginning of a war :).
Michael
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version