Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Contributions to C::B

Improving the Wiki

<< < (5/7) > >>

headkase:

--- Quote from: Alpha on January 03, 2016, 04:12:33 am ---Page is looking very nice.  You may want to mention the cb_release_type global var (I usually use -g but sometimes -O2).

--- End quote ---

Thank you.  The -g option is mentioned on the page but it is only said in text form.  Do you think I should add an image like the WX variable as well?

Edit: Saw your edit. ;)

Alpha:
Hmm, one image should be fine.  Maybe it will be more visible, for people like me, with both bullet points are above the image.

headkase:

--- Quote from: Alpha on January 03, 2016, 04:24:20 am ---Hmm, one image should be fine.  Maybe it will be more visible, for people like me, with both bullet points are above the image.

--- End quote ---

Done.  Also, the structure of the page that existed when I started improving it is still largely the same.  Credit goes to all the previous authors - I followed that outline and just improved the graphics and instructions, it was templated for me.  ;)  :)

LETARTARE:
Hello,
excellent work of clarification.
Happy New Year 2016.
Best regards.

headkase:

--- Quote from: LETARTARE on January 03, 2016, 10:05:54 am ---Hello,
excellent work of clarification.
Happy New Year 2016.
Best regards.

--- End quote ---

Thanks.  Open development is about scratching an itch.  I refer to the compiling from source page often, so I had a vested interest in overhauling it.  ;)  The other two pages I've touched, how to use a nightly - lightly, and installing and configuring MinGW for Code::Blocks - heavily, are tightly coupled with the first page so those three I've done.  I've poked around in other parts of the Wiki but I won't let myself significantly modify a page unless I understand what is behind it.  So, I'm kind of searching for the next page at the moment.  :)  The Wiki is more extensive than it would seem at first glance but unfortunately there also appears to be a lot of information rot in it.  There's a lot there but it just doesn't seem to have been kept up-to-date.

A model of an excellent Wiki is the: Arch Wiki.  If the Code::Blocks Wiki could reach half the comprehensiveness of the Arch Wiki then it would be a true jewel to behold.  That would be more than a one-person effort however, any volunteers? ;)  Request an account! :D

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version