Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
Backticks in Windows Shell/Code::Blocks?
takeshimiya:
Yes, that issue (really? who? :D nice to hear).
But my main concern still remains, for projects written from scratch (without any use of autotools), what I'm saying is still valid (pkg-config is not autotools, and can be used).
thomas:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on January 16, 2006, 09:30:14 am ---really? who? :D nice to hear
--- End quote ---
You.
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on January 10, 2006, 07:08:48 pm ---So I'm thinking if we can do a simple "configure"-like system [...]
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on January 10, 2006, 08:10:46 pm ---Ok, I wanted to know if the idea was welcomed or not, so I could think next.
--- End quote ---
takeshimiya:
Well, I'm trying to attack the current problem of "cbp projects are very different from linux to windows".
I'm yet not convinced by any existant or not existant solution, so there isn't any final word.
Anyways I (researched) more, and maybe pkg-config could suffice, for now (moreover it's standard on linux).
Just a side note: simple "configure"-like system idea is very very far away from autotools import idea.
So, any thoughts on what I'm talking on #3?
thomas:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on January 16, 2006, 10:05:13 am ---Just a side note: simple "configure"-like system idea is very very far away from autotools import idea.
--- End quote ---
Well, in the other thread (out of which I only quoted two lines), you were referring to "Any project that uses a configure script in linux (SDL, GTK, wx, QT, etc), and even personal projects" and "the concept "./configure" in Windows".
This pretty much sounded like "autotools import" to me. Personally, I was amazed then, and I still am, because I don't have even the faintest idea how one could implement such a thing.
takeshimiya:
--- Quote from: thomas on January 16, 2006, 10:43:15 am ---This pretty much sounded like "autotools import" to me.
--- End quote ---
Sorry for the confusion, to clear it up: "./configure" != simple "./configure-like".
--- Quote from: thomas on January 16, 2006, 10:43:15 am ---Personally, I was amazed then, and I still am, because I don't have even the faintest idea how one could implement such a thing.
--- End quote ---
lol, neither I do. Parsing m4 in heavy cryptic 700KB configure scripts is something that we never live enough to see, probably. :lol:
Now that that is clear (I have to learn english), what about pkg-config ~ global variables interaction ?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version