User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
TDM-GCC 4.9 series (Latest: 4.9.2-tdm-1 - 2014-12-08)
stahta01:
--- Quote from: ptDev on January 16, 2015, 03:17:17 pm ---Superb work, as always.
Just a question: Would you consider setting the flag -std=c++11 as active for g++ by default in the next release?
--- End quote ---
I think doing -std=gnu++11 would be better and safer than -std=c++11.
Tim S.
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote from: ptDev on January 16, 2015, 03:17:17 pm ---Just a question: Would you consider setting the flag -std=c++11 as active for g++ by default in the next release?
--- End quote ---
Nope, if you ask me. It is up to the compiler's vendor to decide if c++11 support is safe to use as the default mode.
TDragon:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on January 16, 2015, 11:34:37 pm ---It is up to the compiler's vendor to decide if c++11 support is safe to use as the default mode.
--- End quote ---
I concur. :)
When GCC's developers implement the change, TDM-GCC will.
-John E. / TDM
thomas:
--- Quote from: gd_on on December 13, 2014, 08:02:13 pm ---
--- Quote ---On windows, wxWidgets does NOT officially support 2.8 as being 64 bit compatible.
--- End quote ---
I have already seen this information. Nevetheless, I have myself compiled wxwidgets 2.8.12 in 64 bits
--- End quote ---
I can hardly believe that, since wxWidgets 2.8 contains code that casts pointers to int. Which of course doesn't work too well under 64 bits, even if you somehow get the compiler to do this without bailing out.
That said, I've not been successful at compiling any version of wxWidgets with the most recent TDM compilers, neither 32 nor 64.
thomas:
--- Quote from: thomas on January 19, 2015, 11:23:33 am ---That said, I've not been successful at compiling any version of wxWidgets with the most recent TDM compilers, neither 32 nor 64.
--- End quote ---
This is what I hate about wxWidgets... I just tried again because I was sure someone would ask "What error exactly...?" and I wouldn't remember.
So I ran the same batch file that I've been using to build wxWidgets for 8 or 10 years, which of course fails with the most recent TDM compiler, and now it built just fine with the most recent TDM compiler.
How can building a piece of software be non-deterministic, this is beyond me? Only wxWidgets is ever giving me this trouble.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version