User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
Linker target messsed up on single file
awsdert:
Just remembered about this thread :P
Since stahta01 has a short fuse I'm going to refer to him as shorty from now on.
@oBFusCATed & @ollydbg
Like I said the post shorty :D provided actually helped solve the problem (although I will admit I was not expecting anyone here to go as far as doing their own research on the compiler), the original reason I believed it was a CB cfg problem was because it was an individual file from my project was not compiling even though the rest were doing just fine, after shorty's post I looked into VC's \bin directory and found that I had made a misunderstanding about the compiler thinking that like gcc (that being the only other compiler I have experience with) it used only one executable for generating code, after cloning the compiler profile and setting it up for x64 bit directories everything went smoothly (aside from my own programming mistakes obviously). Shorty just got the wrong end of the stick and thought I wanted people to check the linker options, I only wanted people to check the xml side of things and make sure none of that was the cause of my problem, it was just happy coincidence that he found what I could not.
Edit: Missed a word :P
Jenna:
--- Quote from: awsdert on April 04, 2014, 11:28:44 pm ---Just remembered about this thread :P
Since stahta01 has a short fuse I'm going to refer to him as shorty from now on.
--- End quote ---
If you do not calm down and stop being agressive, you get banned for a while.
No matter what has happened so far, there is no reason to inflame the conflict!
awsdert:
Erm... where do you see aggression? It's normal to give people nicknames related to their personality so that can't be it, but then I can't see anything else you would mis-interpret as aggression sooo ???
Jenna:
--- Quote from: awsdert on April 05, 2014, 09:36:38 am ---Erm... where do you see aggression? It's normal to give people nicknames related to their personality so that can't be it, but then I can't see anything else you would mis-interpret as aggression sooo ???
--- End quote ---
Do you rally want to start a discussion ?
Please do not waste my/our time with it.
Just calm down, don't use degrading nicknames for other users, learn to ask questions in a way others can understand you or leve the forum !
Last warning !!
awsdert:
Seems to me your the one who needs to calm down, and what's degrading about referring to his short fuse? Last I checked referring to facts is NOT aggressive in any way. Whatever I'm ignoring his posts now anyways so I shouldn't have to refer to him in future.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version