Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Contributions to C::B

WIN98/9x/others build : registry settings test

<< < (8/8)

killerbot:
Yiannis,

I can't confirm or 'dis'confirm :-(
I also got his information from ceniza and therion.
I think they got to this by trial and error with some win98 users.
I could never test myself, since I don't have win98 anymore.

Lieven

[EDIT] : one thing is for sure, when they were added to the sdk target, things worked.
Well, you have the best insght, if you think they need to be added to the main, please do. This weekend I will make a new ansi build, so the win98 users will be able to give feedback on it, so then we will know for sure.

mandrav:

--- Quote from: killerbot on January 20, 2006, 09:46:26 am ---I can't confirm or 'dis'confirm :-(

--- End quote ---

OK, added it in the src target 'cause that's where it should be IMHO. If this doesn't work, it's still easy to move them in the sdk target ;)

r1822.

duncanka:

--- Quote from: mandrav on January 20, 2006, 09:57:02 am ---
--- Quote from: killerbot on January 20, 2006, 09:46:26 am ---I can't confirm or 'dis'confirm :-(

--- End quote ---

OK, added it in the src target 'cause that's where it should be IMHO. If this doesn't work, it's still easy to move them in the sdk target ;)

r1822.

--- End quote ---
I just compiled rev1836 on Win98SE.  With shfolder linked into the src target, I got an error about codeblocks.dll using an undefined function.  When I linked shfolder into the sdk target instead, it worked fine.  It appears Lieven was right about Therion's and Ceniza's conclusions.
Note, by the way, that at least in the sdk target, I didn't need shell32 to be linked.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page