User forums > Nightly builds

The 16 November 2013 build (9455) is out.

<< < (9/15) > >>

oBFusCATed:

--- Quote from: ToApolytoXaos on November 25, 2013, 02:30:00 pm ---Is this normal, or I hit a bug?

--- End quote ---
Yes, I think it is normal, but I don't know if this is a good behaviour.

ToApolytoXaos:
Currently compiled svn9468 on Windows 7 machine (at work) and auto-completion does not work properly.

As soon as I insert (*prd->st_info)->, instead of seeing the desired variables, I see whatever prd
has in it.

See the entire sample below:


--- Code: (C) ---/*
 * Placed in Public Domain where applicable permitted by law.
 * USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK!
 */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define nil ((void *)0)

typedef struct {
    int postal_code;
    const char *address;
} street_info_t;

typedef struct {
    street_info_t **st_info;
    const char *company_name;
} generic_t;

street_info_t * str_constructor(void) {
    street_info_t *tmp = (street_info_t *) malloc(sizeof(street_info_t));
    if (tmp == nil) {
        return nil;
    }
    return tmp;
}

void str_destructor(street_info_t **self) {
    if (*self != nil) {
        free(*self);
        *self = nil;
    }
    return;
}

generic_t * constructor(void) {
    generic_t *tmp = (generic_t *) malloc(sizeof(generic_t));
    if (tmp == nil) {
        return nil;
    }
    return tmp;
}

void destructor(generic_t **self) {
    if (*self != nil) {
        free(*self);
        *self = nil;
    }
    return;
}

int main(void)
{
    generic_t *prd = constructor();
    street_info_t *street = str_constructor();

    prd->st_info = &street;
    prd->company_name = "Disney Land";
    (*prd->st_info)->address = "Mikey Mouse avenue, Neverland";
    (*prd->st_info)->postal_code = 1010;

    printf("Company Name: %s\n", prd->company_name);
    printf("Address: %s\n", (*prd->st_info)->address);
    printf("Postal code: %d\n", (*prd->st_info)->postal_code);

    str_destructor(&street);
    prd->st_info = nil;

    destructor(&prd);

    return 0;
}

--- End code ---

oBFusCATed:
Is this a regression in this build?

ollydbg:
@ToApolytoXaos, If I remember correctly, we don't handle the parentheses correctly in CC. (It need some kind of operator precedence parsing of the statement, but currently we don't have this feature)

ToApolytoXaos:
Ah OK, no worries. So it's not a bug, but a lack of feature :) nice. Also, should not be logical to offer only C keywords if you use a project as C, unless it's used in C++ as extern C? Most of the times I get full list of unnecessary keyword tags.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page