User forums > Help

Correct project layout/setup for multiplatform project

<< < (2/2)

Michael:

--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on January 06, 2006, 01:05:02 am ---I was talking for the menu options settings -> compiler & build -> compiler options. They look the same (I'm using c::b from svn, updated yesterday), and behave the same. I made a test to see if this assumption is correct: set the -g option into the first dialog and checked to see what is its value in the second, and they were the same, the reverse is also true.

--- End quote ---

Yes, I see. I have tested it too and AFAIK they are/behave the same.  It seems to me some kind of redundancy :?.

Michael

mandrav:

--- Quote from: Michael on January 06, 2006, 01:21:18 am ---
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on January 06, 2006, 01:05:02 am ---I was talking for the menu options settings -> compiler & build -> compiler options. They look the same (I'm using c::b from svn, updated yesterday), and behave the same. I made a test to see if this assumption is correct: set the -g option into the first dialog and checked to see what is its value in the second, and they were the same, the reverse is also true.

--- End quote ---

Yes, I see. I have tested it too and AFAIK they are/behave the same.  It seems to me some kind of redundancy :?.

Michael


--- End quote ---

Yes, they 're exactly the same. Rick thought that users would have trouble finding one of them so he added them both...

rickg22:
Yes, that was when the Build menu was called "Compile". To me it made more sense having Compiler Options under the "Compile" menu, but that doesn't apply now.

Michael:
Ok, I understand. Thank you for your explanations.

Yes, I agree. When the Build menu was called Compile it had sense to put compiler options there. But now it is IMHO a bit confusing. May be just leave the Global Compiler Options under the Settings menu.

Michael

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page