User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)

c++11

<< < (5/5)

oBFusCATed:
killerbot:
You're so wrong, but I have no time to argue on every statement where you're wrong. :)
Just keep in mind that if you want to develop commercial/binary software on Linux CentOS is best or only choice for a distro and some people are stuck on all Linux distros because their target software works only there.

mistar: No one stops you from using C++11 in your plugins, but if you want to contribute them to the main repo then they have to be C++98 (GCC >= 4.0)

p.s. I don't intend to spend any more time on this topic.

thomas:

--- Quote from: killerbot on October 15, 2013, 01:26:16 pm ---When we continue this conservative approach our-self, we will be stuck to old C++ for another decade.
[...]
So there is a balance somewhere, and for sure no aggressive dictatorship claiming to revert any commit with c++11, that's just an opinion like any other, a valid opinion at this time.
--- End quote ---



--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on October 15, 2013, 12:53:23 pm ---
--- Quote from: thomas on October 15, 2013, 12:49:11 pm ---...who is still using GCC version 3.3 or 3.4...

--- End quote ---
We require GCC 4.0 (C++ TR1) for quite awhile, so I doubt you're correct.

--- End quote ---

I'm wrong about the exact GCC version, my apologies, but I'm correct about the matter as such. If I may refresh your memory (emphasis added by me):


--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on November 07, 2012, 09:08:21 am ---
--- Quote from: killerbot on November 06, 2012, 11:56:26 pm ---But more important, the build is broken. Thomas, you have introduced C++11 code, which will not compile unless we start using that option. I want to avoid the discussion at this moment, I would like to open it after the next release ;-)

--- End quote ---
No need to discuss it (again), I'll revert any c++11 commit because I use gcc4.1.2 at work ( Centos 5.8 ), which is non c++11 enabled. C++11 will be allowed when we have a redhat release with gcc4.7!
--- End quote ---

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page