Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Plugins development

RAD TOOL developers wanted

<< < (8/19) > >>

upCASE:
Hi!

--- Quote from: mispunt ---
upCase: your program looks very prommising, hopefully we can get a plugin of it very soon.
--- End quote ---

Thanks! I'm trying to get rid of some bugs and implement some new widgets. I will have to change some things in the propertygrid to make it more "intuitive" and give it the ability for event tables later on.
First step will be a MIME plugin I guess.

mandrav:

--- Quote ---First step will be a MIME plugin I guess.
--- End quote ---

"The easy way out" :)
It's better this way, at least until it's stable. So you won't have to chase bugs around your code *and* codeblocks ;)

Yiannis.

takeshimiya:
I think we all agree that upCase RAD looks very promising :)
And, in the long-term using upCase implementation is the best
In the meantime, some kind of integration with a currently very functional working implementation of a wx RAD (like DialogBlocks or wxDesigner) is desired.

For example, if DialogBlocks outputs Code::Blocks projects you'll end having a platform to develop more fast and easily the upCase RAD GUI itself and working right now.

I also vote for the upCase MIME plugin easy way, dealing with less bugs the better =)

DreadNot:
What's the status on this thing  8) .
I'm seriously fed up with no community IDE having a decent RAD tool.
I've been using Dev-Cpp for some time but didn't care to contrib to a Delphi codebase.
C::B looks like a very good start as a direct replacement to Dev-Cpp for me.
As I'm an experienced C++ programming and I have some free time, I wanna jump in with both feet  :D .

BTW, it's kinda funny that C::B is wxWindows based and that wxWindows is primarily maintained by Julian Smart, but this discussion sounds really down on using him as a source for the RAD tool.  He can essentially do what he wants with his code as a commercial product, but asking him to contribute is cheap.  If he wants to contribute some or all of his codebase under GPL to C::B, are we not worthy to receive it?  He doesn't have to develop the plugin, just post the code (or significant portions) under GPL for our use.

DreadNot:
Oh, yeah.  What about wxFormBuilder?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version