Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

workspace on steroids

(1/1)

killerbot:
Hi,

It has been already proposed to give the workspaces more power, what do you think of the following :
- compiler options/defines on the workspace ==> applies to every project in the workspace (has already been mentioned)
- grouping of projects (aka like virtual folders), so project A, D, H go together in some group, and project B, O,P in some other group. Where the grouping makes some sense to the user, this grouping should then also be visible in the project tree


oBFusCATed:
I had plans on working on this, bug got sidetracked by the ui stuff. :(

ollydbg:
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/on+steroids
"on steroids" means:  in a much more powerful or extreme form :)


--- Quote from: killerbot on April 24, 2013, 10:57:24 pm ---- compiler options/defines on the workspace ==> applies to every project in the workspace (has already been mentioned)

--- End quote ---
I love this feature. Is it related to some discussion of using some global variables (GCV, like -O2, -g...)?

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: killerbot on April 24, 2013, 10:57:24 pm ---- compiler options/defines on the workspace ==> applies to every project in the workspace (has already been mentioned)
- grouping of projects (aka like virtual folders), so project A, D, H go together in some group, and project B, O,P in some other group. Where the grouping makes some sense to the user, this grouping should then also be visible in the project tree

--- End quote ---
For the first: Yes.
For the second: What would be a use-case?

oBFusCATed:

--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on April 25, 2013, 07:48:16 am ---For the second: What would be a use-case?

--- End quote ---
To group related projects, like one group for libraries, one group for plugins, etc.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

Go to full version