Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development
"Targets" v. "Projects" and (attached|workspace) property sheets
thomas:
--- Quote from: 280Z28 on December 30, 2005, 12:10:06 am ---@thomas: Are you in on this as well?
--- End quote ---
I'll say "no" because I don't understand the question.
280Z28:
--- Quote from: thomas on December 30, 2005, 01:07:01 am ---
--- Quote from: 280Z28 on December 30, 2005, 12:10:06 am ---@thomas: Are you in on this as well?
--- End quote ---
I'll say "no" because I don't understand the question.
--- End quote ---
If you can say that you don't and won't make posts to "attack me," then I am saying that I will make sure to not interpret something you write as such. If I feel I was attacked when I first read something you write, then I'll re-read it with the assumption that I misinterpreted what you said. :) I felt attacked by mandrav in this thread, but it was a misinterpretation on my part. I don't want that to happen again.
thomas:
Although I am having a really big problem with your personality from the very first moment, you can rest assured that I am never intentionally "attacking" you. Personal attacks are unprofessional and do not bring forth development. :)
280Z28:
--- Quote from: thomas on December 30, 2005, 01:38:17 am ---Although I am having a really big problem with your personality from the very first moment, you can rest assured that I am never intentionally "attacking" you. Personal attacks are unprofessional and do not bring forth development. :)
--- End quote ---
Thanks man, that's all I needed to hear. I'll definitely keep that in mind. :)
Once mandrav sees the end of this thread (my acknowledgement that I made a misunderstanding), can we delete everything but my first post and move the thread to the compiler redesign forum?
rickg22:
Erm, the redesign forum has been marked as dev-only. It was a mistake of mine to open it to public discussion so early, plus, with the recent developments I don't think such a big redesign will be necessary.
Anyway about your "set of properties", how about leaving that as "pending", and maybe (MAYBE) we can look at it again after v1.0 is released.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version