User forums > Help
wxAuiTabCtrlcbauibook.cpp:414:39: error: 'class wxAuiTabCtrl' has no member name
Jenna:
--- Quote from: stahta01 on February 10, 2013, 05:25:36 pm ---
--- Quote from: smallB on February 08, 2013, 11:08:24 am ---cbauibook.cpp:415:32: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'class wxToolTip'
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: jens on February 08, 2013, 11:56:01 am ---And which version of C::B do you try to build ?
--- End quote ---
Question in addition to jens questions.
Are you compiling with Pre-compiled headers or without them?
Most people compile CB with Pre-compiled headers;
every so often this type of error happens because of missing includes in CB source for NON Pre-compiled header builds.
Tim S.
--- End quote ---
The headerfile for the tooltips is included directly (without using pch's), at least in cbauibook.cpp .
JustAuser:
error when attempting to install latest version of CodeBlocks on CentOS 6.4:
cbauibook.cpp: In member function ‘void cbAuiNotebook::OnMotion(wxMouseEvent&)’:
cbauibook.cpp:414: error: ‘class wxAuiTabCtrl’ has no member named ‘GetToolTip’
cbauibook.cpp:415: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘struct wxToolTip’
/usr/local/include/wx-2.8/wx/window.h:65: error: forward declaration of ‘struct wxToolTip’
I just downloaded wxWidgets as CodeBlocks' instructions suggest,
ran
./bootstrap
ran
./configure
they ran just fine without any errors or warnings.
But when I ran "make" the errors began.
Why did I installed CodeBlocks on Windows in ONE CLICK, and using CodeBlocks on Windows without any problems, but it took me 4 hours to research how to get to this point, and still I am stuck at "make".
Crazy. No unified procedures, no unified (expected) user experience like Windows. Idiocy.
Jenna:
Same question as before: why do you use a self-build wxWidgets ?
Always prefer the version shipped for your distro (if possible).
Did you try the packages from my repo ?
See http://rpm.jenslody.de for instructions.
JustAuser:
1. Installed the
yum install rpmforge-release-0.5.3-1.el6.rf.i686.rpm
but still getting the same error.
I do not see what is the reason that you think installing rpmforge will "fix" the error.
The problem is not in rpm forge. The problem is in declared but undefined (non-existing implementation) of functions (functionality).
Still as crazy and loony as before. Even crazier to think that some rpm forge will define funcitonality of non-existing functions (procedures).
2. When you are talking about "shipped with your linux distro", I do not get it: I simply downloaded the entire distro from CentOS, installed it. When I try to search for wxWidgets in "AddRemove software" of CentOS, it is not found anywhere. Not on local machine not on CentOS site.
3. Just continuous waste of time. It appears people have no clue about any solutions, but posting "solutions" here regardless to look like "pros". Deceiving themselves. You loose credibility. You loose users. You make yourself look like loosers. You do not understand one thing: people who post here are not interested in writing in a vicious loop, forever( look, for, solutions).
--- Quote from: jens on March 30, 2013, 08:58:54 am ---Same question as before: why do you use a self-build wxWidgets ?
Always prefer the version shipped for your distro (if possible).
Did you try the packages from my repo ?
See http://rpm.jenslody.de for instructions.
--- End quote ---
oBFusCATed:
--- Quote --- author=JustAuser link=topic=17490.msg121355#msg121355 date=1364747986]
2. When you are talking about "shipped with your linux distro", I do not get it: I simply downloaded the entire distro from CentOS, installed it. When I try to search for wxWidgets in "AddRemove software" of CentOS, it is not found anywhere. Not on local machine not on CentOS site.
--- End quote ---
Sorry, but then you have to talk to CentOS devs to include wxGTK in your package list we cannot provide it.
Have you tried
--- Code: ---yum update
yum install wxGTK wxGTK-devel or
yum search wxgtk
--- End code ---
after you've installed the rpmforge repo?
Also have you removed your old wxGTK install?
Edit:
--- Quote from: JustAuser on March 31, 2013, 06:39:46 pm ---3. Just continuous waste of time. It appears people have no clue about any solutions, but posting "solutions" here regardless to look like "pros". Deceiving themselves. You loose credibility. You loose users. You make yourself look like loosers. You do not understand one thing: people who post here are not interested in writing in a vicious loop, forever( look, for, solutions).
--- End quote ---
Sorry, but it appears that you have no clue how to manage your system, so you loose credibility and make yourself look like a looser.
I couldn't resist to post in this style sorry.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version