Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign

Requirements / Guidelines for re-writing the Code Completion

<< < (4/6) > >>

pass86:
Like VisualAssistXv10.

rickg22:
I'm adding this link:

http://www.codeproject.com/showcase/VisualAssistX.asp

for reference, to see where we are and where we want to get.

byo:
Out of STL vs wxWidgets debate:
Maybe it would be good idea to split current CC plugin into two plugins - one for actual code assisting and one for strict code parsing. If it will be done in this way, one can simply write parsing-only plugin to support extra language an thus allowing it inside assist window. And what's also nice about this - other plugins may use tree generated by parser plugin to do some magic - like CodeBrowser plugin (presented somewhere in this forum), becuase there's no use writing separate parser for each plugin that require some code analysis (and just imagine how much it could ease writing refactoring plugin).
Assist plugin could be developed separately giving better code assisting no matter what language is used.

What do you think ?

Regards
   BYO

Der Meister:
Sounds great but I wonder if it would be easier and better to start from scratch than to split up the existing CC plugin. Because the CC plugin is already quite complex and I doubt that splitting it can easily be done without a lot of code-rewriting. Probably this will get worse if we try to give both separated plugins a good interface, but this would be needed. But this is just a guess, maybe someone who is more familier with the CC plugin than I am can say more about it :)

pass86:
It needs to be running more quickly.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page