User forums > Nightly builds

The 12.11 RC2 (23 November 2012 build 8598) is out.

<< < (21/24) > >>

Alpha:

--- Quote from: eckard_klotz on January 15, 2013, 07:55:07 am ---Installing a nightly means only extract some compressed files, what can be done without admin-rights.

--- End quote ---
The Windows installers do not require admin-rights (... at least, last time I checked they did not).
You could also consider building your own copy from source; the first time you try this, it might take some time/effort, but after that, it is fairly easy.  And then you will not need to wait, if you do not want to, for a nightly to acquire newer changes.


--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on January 17, 2013, 04:25:08 pm ---The next nightly will bring major changes btw...

--- End quote ---
Major ;)

eckard_klotz:
Hello Morten and Alpha.


--- Quote ---The Windows installers do not require admin-rights (... at least, last time I checked they did not).

--- End quote ---
This may be the case on your private computer. But if you are using a machine maintained from a central support-team you may have less rights. And if you have to follow additional process-rules ("law of a company") for doing something like this installing becomes not easier.

On the other side between the releases you always answer questions about the next release with:
  "... use the nightly, since it contains everything you will get if we would post a release now ..." 
Now you post a release and I wonder where is the nightly?

Please don't take me wrong. I think the most important thing is, the next nightly will come, so I will wait for it.
Thank you for all your replies. And please accept my apologize if I stressed this point to much.

Best regards,
                   Eckard.




 

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: eckard_klotz on January 18, 2013, 08:35:39 am ---This may be the case on your private computer. But if you are using a machine maintained from a central support-team you may have less rights. And if you have to follow additional process-rules ("law of a company") for doing something like this installing becomes not easier.

--- End quote ---
Well the installer comes in two flavours to suite exactly your need in case you don't have admin rights. Please read the download section on our webpage more carefully. (Not just the download links at BerliOS/SourceForge).


--- Quote from: eckard_klotz on January 18, 2013, 08:35:39 am ---On the other side between the releases you always answer questions about the next release with:
  "... use the nightly, since it contains everything you will get if we would post a release now ..." 
Now you post a release and I wonder where is the nightly?

--- End quote ---
Sorry, but I don't get whats the problem here.
We release:
{[...],nightly,...,nightly,release,nightly,[...]nightly,release,[...]}
We are now at the marked stage. So yes, this is one of the less cases where there is no nightly which is newer than the release. What again is your problem (maybe I am just too dumb to see...)?! :-\

eckard_klotz:
Hello Morten.

Since there will be a next nightly, there is no problem at all.  I just wanted to explain why I started this discussion.

I think at the end I have coursed more confusion than clearness. Please accept my apologize for doing that. There is nothing you have to be worry about.

Thanks for all your great work you have done and you will do in the future.

Best regards,
                  Eckard.

ham:
Hi, thx for the ongoing hard work, i really appreciate.

I have found some issues on LinuxMint64 C::B svn 8832

#1

The code-completion does not work for me as it should.

I work with the irrlicht engine, everything is found in namespace irr, irr::core, irr::video etc...

when i use a statement "using namespace irr;" in my main.cpp then the cc does not
include the related things into the cc-list, i still have to write irr::anything to get access.

The same happens when i am inside a namespace scope

namespace irr{
namespace video{

irr::video::anything  i have to write irr::? to get access to the cc-list

}}

#2

when i have pointers/references to classes and use ->/. operators, then there is often (not always) no cc-list showing
members and functions and such.

--> so cc is not usable for me after update to 12rc, but it happened to work much better in previous svn-version 8600 and like

#3

in the mainmenu - edit - end of line modes the netries are mixed up (unix == CR ?) and (mac == LF),
i believe its the other way around. (unix == LF and mac == CR)

mmmmhhh #3 seems to be fixed

#4 when i have a class i.e. IImage and i press right and want to find its declaration or implementation, codeblocks simply does not find it.

the class header "IImage.h" is declared in file <irrlicht.h> which is included in my main.cpp.

thx in advance

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version