User forums > Nightly builds
The 01 November 2012 build (8497) is out.
oBFusCATed:
rickg22: Why don't you modify the empty project template and commit it? Or duplicate it and name it "Empty no compiler project" or something like that?
rickg22:
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on November 06, 2012, 12:20:50 am ---rickg22: Why don't you modify the empty project template and commit it? Or duplicate it and name it "Empty no compiler project" or something like that?
--- End quote ---
Because I barely have time :(
dmoore:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on November 07, 2012, 07:22:53 pm ---
--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on November 06, 2012, 12:20:50 am ---rickg22: Why don't you modify the empty project template and commit it? Or duplicate it and name it "Empty no compiler project" or something like that?
--- End quote ---
Because I barely have time :(
--- End quote ---
I need something like this too for some of the scripted language projects I work on. The other problem with commands only is that it can't be run or debugged. Is there a reason why not?
(Btw, won't there be other problems if a project does not have a compiler set? e.g. some of the core/plugins probably expect a project will have a compiler.) Happy to spend some time on this, but I want to work on the user customizable main and module menu stuff first.
Alpha:
--- Quote from: dmoore on November 07, 2012, 07:38:53 pm ---I need something like this too for some of the scripted language projects I work on. The other problem with commands only is that it can't be run or debugged. Is there a reason why not?
--- End quote ---
It would probably be best to modify this in the XML Compiler branch, however I am not sure if features should be held off from that branch currently so it can be focused on merging (devs, is there a normal procedure here?).
If I can think of a good idea, I might try working on this as well...
--- Quote from: rickg22 on November 05, 2012, 11:01:22 pm ---I'm always forced to "choose" a compiler - and I always end up choosing GCC by default, which obviously I don't have on this machine. I want to be able to choose "No compiler" or something, so that it won't ask me for compiler settings.
--- End quote ---
So creating a dummy "Null Compiler" should suit your purposes?
dmoore:
@alpha: Don't make any changes on account of me. Get the stuff merged into trunk first. A final thought on the "commands only" target: Does it make any sense for that target to have any of the build option tabs other than the pre/post build steps?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version