User forums > Help

question - C99

<< < (2/2)

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: AZ on October 05, 2012, 05:40:16 pm ---ok. thank you

--- End quote ---
Using the compiler branch (which will be merged into trunk later) you can define any option you like you self. We are planning a nightly of this branch any time soon (actually it should have been out already). So wait a little and grab that one.

Alatar:
UP!

Please, add -std=c99 and -std=gnu99 to default xml file?

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: Alatar on September 01, 2014, 11:09:47 am ---Please, add -std=c99 and -std=gnu99 to default xml file?

--- End quote ---
It is there for me...?!

Alatar:
I`m think for any of C::B developer.
Generally I don`t need this options but I look at commit history today and saw r9874. I don`t understand why there is no C99-related options here, so I decide to ask you to add them.

stahta01:

--- Quote from: Alatar on September 01, 2014, 02:48:39 pm ---I`m think for any of C::B developer.
Generally I don`t need this options but I look at commit history today and saw r9874. I don`t understand why there is no C99-related options here, so I decide to ask you to add them.

--- End quote ---

Is there a real reason you are keeping the version and distro of the Code::Blocks you are using secret?
Edit: And, the CB name Compiler you are using.

Edit2: If the information needed to duplicate the problem is NOT given; you will likely be ignored by the CB Devs.

Tim S.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page