Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Compiler Framework Redesign
suggestion: add "Download" button into Compiler Framework"
dmoore:
Adding variable substitution to the run target would be a useful feature I think.
I was also hoping to convince the other devs to make the "commands only" target runnable. This would add some flexibility as well.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: dmoore on December 14, 2012, 03:47:32 pm ---Adding variable substitution to the run target would be a useful feature I think.
--- End quote ---
What do you mean by that? I didn't get the idea.
--- Quote from: dmoore on December 14, 2012, 03:47:32 pm ---I was also hoping to convince the other devs to make the "commands only" target runnable. This would add some flexibility as well.
--- End quote ---
You know usually its easier to convince people with a patch... ;D
dmoore:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on December 14, 2012, 04:25:42 pm ---
--- Quote from: dmoore on December 14, 2012, 03:47:32 pm ---Adding variable substitution to the run target would be a useful feature I think.
--- End quote ---
What do you mean by that? I didn't get the idea.
--- End quote ---
Just to run the standard macro substitutions on the assembled command line string for the run target after the user clicks run (assume that we don't already do this?)
--- Quote ---
--- Quote from: dmoore on December 14, 2012, 03:47:32 pm ---I was also hoping to convince the other devs to make the "commands only" target runnable. This would add some flexibility as well.
--- End quote ---
You know usually its easier to convince people with a patch... ;D
--- End quote ---
But of course ;) unless someone wants to get in ahead of me. :) Wasn't sure what the rationale was for commands only and whether it was a conscious decision that it should not be "runnable"
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: dmoore on December 15, 2012, 02:39:38 am ---Wasn't sure what the rationale was for commands only and whether it was a conscious decision that it should not be "runnable"
--- End quote ---
Well the issue here is: What to run? There is no executable produced or alike. So it will need some tweaking - currently C::B would report that the executable has not been built yet. Note that pre- and post-build steps actually should work. So what exactly would you "run"?
Alatar:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on December 14, 2012, 03:37:51 pm ---
--- Quote from: Alatar on December 14, 2012, 02:10:30 pm ---Another idea - allow to launch Tools/Tools+ command on "Run".
--- End quote ---
You can do this already now by using macros in the Tools/Tools+ setup.
--- End quote ---
Can you explain me how to do this? I don`t found.
I`m work with different MCU type at same time and each of them use his own download tool. I can create several Tools+ items and bind them to keyboard shortcuts but I need to remember which shortcut I need to use with current project. It will be more comfortable if I press F9 and CB build and download firmware with Tools+ item selected in project settings.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version