Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Development

Sqrat

<< < (2/3) > >>

thomas:
Interesting... I'm just now browsing the Sqrat SVN repo, and it turns out that the missing _SCs that I complain about are in HEAD. So apparently just my local copy is screwed up, or outdated, or whatever.

So that's that. Guess we can live with commenting out one line in Squirrel.h.

Remains to be decided what to do with enum.

oBFusCATed:
One question: Will swtiching from SqPlus to Scrat break scripts? I was looking at it and it looked like so.

MortenMacFly:

--- Quote from: thomas on June 27, 2012, 04:22:06 pm ---So that's that. Guess we can live with commenting out one line in Squirrel.h.

--- End quote ---
OK - that's nice. :-)


--- Quote from: thomas on June 27, 2012, 04:22:06 pm ---Remains to be decided what to do with enum.

--- End quote ---
Can you provide a test case of all three solutions? For the enums: What do we do currently with SQPlus (I cannot have a look atm...)?

thomas:

--- Quote from: oBFusCATed on June 27, 2012, 04:41:51 pm ---One question: Will swtiching from SqPlus to Scrat break scripts? I was looking at it and it looked like so.

--- End quote ---
I wouldn't know why it should break any script. They both register classes or functions that scripts can call. If we do the registering 1:1, then all should work the same.

oBFusCATed:
I'm not really sure, the demo code showed was different, but my understanding of squirrel is pretty weak.

There was difference in how the code looked and there was the instancing operator used '<-' and I think when using scrat it is mandatory.
But I may be wrong, of course.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page