Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Compiler Framework Redesign
XML based compilers
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: thomas on June 21, 2012, 06:25:19 pm ---If you want to waste some time in the evening playing with it, I can share the project. Maybe I'm only just too stupid, and you can figure it out.
--- End quote ---
To be honest I never tried myself, just found this link when looking for a more up-to-date SQPlus. So sure, gimme gimme... (I am back btw...).
And btw:
--- Quote from: thomas on June 19, 2012, 02:05:30 am ---Well, if nothing helps, we can still move back to Angelscript, which is well supported. Ironically, the reason why we abandoned Angelscript back then was that it didn't do 64 bits at that time... ;D
--- End quote ---
This is really fun and honestly I don't get it: Did we ever try 64 bit with scripting at that time seriously? Because then we would have found out easily that we are doomed with SQPlus. I wonder if it is working straight forward on Linux though... on Windows its very bad and it gets even worse as new (more strict) compilers hit the floor.
Having said that, returning to AngelScript is also not that easy: For example, all the script binding would need to be re-done.... :'(
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Alpha on June 22, 2012, 07:51:38 am ---Preliminary documentation is done.
--- End quote ---
Huh - the first pach provider with a documentation! That's Wohooo! ;-)
BTW: I have tried the patch before the last one during the time I was off - this already seems to work quite well. I didn't find any serious show-stoppers. I'll try version the next days...
Some comments I do have:
1.) I changed the log messages when the XML file cannot be found or alike to cbMessageBoxes. Because if tat happens the compiler is in an "undefined" state and you cannot use it. Newbies won't realise that and otherwise our forums get flooded with such requests. Maybe we should even disable this particular compiler in such a case. But disabling compilers hasn't an API so far IMHO...
2.) I think later on we can/should transfer the regexes and advanced compiler options to the XML file, too. For this, it needs an interface to the configmanager.
MortenMacFly:
...I just saw: Did you realise SVN revision 8060? Is this already integrated? Its not a very wise thing to change the compilers at the moment in SVN. Maybe we should lock the plugin for a while...
thomas:
Sqrat test attached, no external dependencies. Unzip, doubleclick, hit "build".
Builds the libs, the sq interpreter, and a test program which installs error handlers, binds one function, and compiles a 1-line script that calls this function (which is enough to crash).
[attachment deleted by admin]
killerbot:
I added some compiler options, wouldn't lock it at this moment. Important for adding C++11 related ones.
A for showing message boxes, ensure they don't end up to much during project loading and building. Eg project building for several compilers, but then you use it on a system where some compiler is not present ==> should just be mentioned in text in the build log (as it is now), no message boxes, otherwise automated building is broken.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version