Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > Compiler Framework Redesign
XML based compilers
Alpha:
Strange... are you certain that was the name it warned about? I did add options_common_sort.xml; try running update(.bat) again to see if that fixes it.
(Speaking of which, I forgot to add the file to the .cbp's.)
Alpha:
Added/changed:
* C/C++ - only flag listings can be configured
* Clarify logging of command failed to execute case
* Minor logging tweaks (1 second vs. 2 seconds, etc)
* Tweak GCC auto-detect and compiler flags
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on August 07, 2012, 07:36:38 pm ---Giving it a try< leads to tons of errors at startup of C::B, that compiler_options_sort.xml could not be fund.
--- End quote ---
By the way, has this been resolved?
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: Alpha on August 07, 2012, 07:54:44 pm ---Strange... are you certain that was the name it warned about? I did add options_common_sort.xml; try running update(.bat) again to see if that fixes it.
--- End quote ---
Oh - I missed hat post. And yes: That was it I figured it out myself when updating from SVN.
Alpha:
On the compiler toolbar, the label "Build target:" takes up a lot of space, and no other toolbar has any such label. Does anyone have a reason why this text should not be removed (switched to a tooltip)?
Alpha:
This patch makes first run a little more friendly, and removes the static text from the compiler toolbar.
(By the way, I just got a blue screen of death... in safemode. So I have decided to try Linux again. When I use Autotools to build Code::Blocks, the resulting executable can be run by clicking on it. If I use Code::Blocks to build Code::Blocks, the green run button works, however manual execution of Code::Blocks fails due to not finding libcodeblocks.so. Is there another solution besides the one in the wiki - which does not seem to quite apply to me - that I could try? I am on Ubuntu.)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version