User forums > General (but related to Code::Blocks)
BLITZ support?
Michael:
Yes, you are right concerning PCH. But, IMHO I think that doing the same with several technologies at the same time would be more complicate and difficult to mantain later (as the compilers change during the time).
Michael
takeshimiya:
Well, then the question arises...
What are the future goals of C::B? Being a simple (DevCpp alike) IDE, or being a more full-featured IDE (Xcode, Eclipse, KDevelop alike)?
Michael:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on December 05, 2005, 08:07:46 pm ---Well, then the question arises...
What are the future goals of C::B? Being a simple (DevCpp alike) IDE, or being a more full-featured IDE (Xcode, Eclipse, KDevelop alike)?
--- End quote ---
Yes, right. Soon or later such decisions should be taken. I would prefer for a more full-featured IDE like Eclipse...Anyway, for the moment C::B is IMHO simply doing great.
Michael
takeshimiya:
--- Quote from: Michael on December 05, 2005, 08:17:34 pm ---Anyway, for the moment C::B is IMHO simply doing great.
--- End quote ---
We all know that, if not we'll not be here :)
But Eclipse have some advantages because their community is so big.
I for myself would like to see C::B going mainstream so the entire world isn't just Java|.NET
sethjackson:
--- Quote from: Takeshi Miya on December 05, 2005, 08:43:31 pm ---
--- Quote from: Michael on December 05, 2005, 08:17:34 pm ---Anyway, for the moment C::B is IMHO simply doing great.
--- End quote ---
We all know that, if not we'll not be here :)
But Eclipse have some advantages because their community is so big.
I for myself would like to see C::B going mainstream so the entire world isn't just Java|.NET
--- End quote ---
Exactly. :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version