Developer forums (C::B DEVELOPMENT STRICTLY!) > CodeCompletion redesign
Question about the code completion revamping done around 2010...
rickg22:
Well, one of my problems was that kdesvn (I'm on linux) can't show the changes for a specific version of a specific file. I have to use the log, search the file among the 300 changed files in the scrollable list, and THEN do the diff. Yeah, it sucks.
But with websvn, it's great. Thanks, Jens!
BTW, why the explicit change from string to wxString? with the little macros I had added at the top, it should be equivalent.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on November 06, 2011, 02:05:43 pm ---BTW, why the explicit change from string to wxString? with the little macros I had added at the top, it should be equivalent.
--- End quote ---
IIRC this was because of an incompatibility with certain STL ANSI functions that were used in combination with Unicode. I've exchanged the ANSI methods with their (wx) Unicode equivalents and while I were at is, I also moved the rest to wx(string).
rickg22:
Yeah, but with the macros, all string references would be replaced to their wx equivalents. Unless I did the inclusions wrong :-/ But never mind.
The point is that I can copy (move?) SearchTree to the SDK where it can be more useful for other searching stuff (find in files, TODO items, etc). Mwahahahahaha.
MortenMacFly:
--- Quote from: rickg22 on November 06, 2011, 02:56:09 pm ---Yeah, but with the macros, all string references would be replaced to their wx equivalents.
--- End quote ---
Yes, but what's the point of doing "macro magic" when we always compile this portion using wxWidgets? It just leads to confusion. Anyways... go ahead. ;-)
rickg22:
--- Quote from: MortenMacFly on November 06, 2011, 03:12:35 pm ---
--- Quote from: rickg22 on November 06, 2011, 02:56:09 pm ---Yeah, but with the macros, all string references would be replaced to their wx equivalents.
--- End quote ---
Yes, but what's the point of doing "macro magic" when we always compile this portion using wxWidgets?
--- End quote ---
For portability purposes, i.e. using that class in other projects. Anyway, thanks for the info.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version